[Esip-drone] Draft drone data sharing guidelines for earth and environmental science.

[Jane Wyngaard]

Hi all

Thanks to everyone who's already responded to this, if you haven't had a
chance this really is pretty quick.  Again we asking anyone using drones
for data capture to complete this short survey
<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1soc89VUQxgl_MYulGSdUuREJM_0x7sZPe5Js55-JMUM/viewform?>
to community-check our efforts to model the information pipeline involved
in scientific drone data capture.  With the ultimate end goal being readily
usable tools for capturing semantically enriched drone data as a component
of making drone data FAIR.

Survey link is here
<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1soc89VUQxgl_MYulGSdUuREJM_0x7sZPe5Js55-JMUM/viewform?>,
we're able to leave it open till the 15 August (next Wednesday so 1 more
week).

Thanks again,

Jane
++++++++++++++++
Jane Wyngaard, PhD

Data Science Technologist
Centre for Research Computing
University of Notre Dame


On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 11:16 AM Jane Wyngaard <jwyngaar at nd.edu> wrote:

> Hi drone cluster,
>
> We [1] are drafting *data sharing guidelines for earth and environmental
> data collected with drones*, and we need *your help*.  If you use drones
> for scientific data collection at all please take 10-15 minutes to review
> and provide feedback on our proposed* minimum information framework* in
> this *survey* <http://bit.ly/droneDataSurvey>.
> http://bit.ly/droneDataSurvey
>
> *More Context:*
> Over the last few years you probably know we have run workshops, developed
> case studies, and talked to many of you to get a sense of what kind of data
> needs to be published to make drone data FAIR [2]. As part of an ESIP
> incubator project, we've summarised the results of this work into a Minimum
> Information Framework: a list of the key data and metadata elements that
> would make drone datasets FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable,
> Reusable)[2].
>
> We're now asking one more time for your feedback to help us refine this
> framework! What terms are we missing? What terms aren't necessary?
>
> Please vote on the importance of the terms in our framework, and suggest
> additional terms that we may have overlooked. Many of these terms appear in
> existing ontologies or standards; after the results of the survey are in,
> we will link our community-developed set of terms to these existing
> standards.
>
> [1] Andrea Thomer, Jane Wyngaard, Lindsay Barbieri - a team of information
> scientists and earth scientists working with the ESIP Drone Cluster and RDA
> sUAS Data Interest Group: https://osf.io/n6t9b/
>
> [2]  The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and
> stewardship <https://www.nature.com/articles/sdata201618>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Jane, Lindsay, Andrea
> ++++++++++++++++
> Jane Wyngaard, PhD
>
> Data Science Technologist
> Centre for Research Computing
> University of Notre Dame
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-drone/attachments/20180808/921a1f6f/attachment.html>