[Durham INC] Study about Rail Road Crossings in Durham
Pat Carstensen
pats1717 at hotmail.com
Sat Apr 27 17:06:03 EDT 2013
Ed and I ran into Mark Ahrendsen today. He said that the Broad/Swift grade separation was in the report to show that it could be done and would be terrible. So we should be energetically saying just how terrible it is, but given the budget for making changes along the rail corridor, most likely other locations, such as Ellis Road, will be where the road will be raised over the railroad bed.
Regards, pat
Subject: Re: [Durham INC] Study about Rail Road Crossings in Durham
From: ninth.st at frontier.com
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 07:30:12 -0400
CC: pats1717 at hotmail.com; inc-list at durhaminc.org
To: TheOcean1 at aol.com
I'm very concerned about the walkability of our downtown streetscape. Ramping the roads over the tracks removes the blocks on both sides of the tracks from the human landscape and turns them into a vehicle-scale construction. If you've ever walked from 5 Points to the West End on Chapel Hill Street -- there are sidewalks, but the experience of crossing the freeway bridge area is bleak and industrial.
The conversation I've had about this with friends always ends with people saying that having the new commuter and light rail is so important we'll have to just put up with whatever it takes. I hope there are more options here and we can win/win instead of win/lose.
Jan Martell
On Apr 27, 2013, at 1:11 AM, TheOcean1 at aol.com wrote:
To reach
as close to the perfect conclusion as possible, the city and its citizens
will need to hit a balance between what the railroad wants, and what the people
want.
I'm just
guessing, but that will probably mean concessions that seem insane to us
regarding certain intersections like Ellis Rd, in exchange for things far more
important to the majority of us, such as creating trails downtown from
unused tracks.
Bill
Anderson
In a message dated 4/26/2013 10:40:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
pats1717 at hotmail.com writes:
There was a sequence of public forums this month about the study
to make the places where roads cross railroads in Durham safer. I went
looking for more information on the web. What I found:
Minutes from presentation to INC in February 2012:
Kevin
Hall talked about the Traffic Separation Study, where the “traffic” to
be separated is what is on the railroad track through town, which could be
high-speed rail or more frequent commuter rail in the future. The
options for the 18 crossing being studied are doing nothing, closing the
crossing, improving it with better marking or barriers, or actually separating
the grades of the street and the railroad. The changes could be anywhere
from short-term (0-3 years) to long-term (7-10 years). It is an 18-month
study, kicked off with visioning workshops in November. Nothing is
decided yet as they are still collecting data. The study will consider
safety (e.g., accident history), mobility and accessibility (how much traffic
there is there, for example), and social and economic resources (funding,
land-use and so on). The one crossing people had major comments on was
the Broad Street / Swift Avenue one. John will send out the maps and comment
information to the list-serve so folks can ask their neighborhoods for their
ideas and input.
There are similar studies going on in other NC cities, with more detail
on what is being proposed there.
The best information I could find on the Durham study is at http://www.durhamnc.gov/agendas_new/2012/cws20121217/8915_PRESENTATION_DURHAM_TRAFFIC_SEPARATION_319363_483869.ppt.PDF
It looks like they are looking at making BIG, BIG HILLS so the road can
go over the railroad at Neal, LaSalle, Anderson, Swift/Broad, Duke, and the
list goes on. The report on the Swift/Broad crossing that we heard at
the recent INC meeting was pretty scary.
Regards, pat
=
_______________________________________________
Durham
INC Mailing
List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
_______________________________________________
Durham INC Mailing List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20130427/a4ef0fbd/attachment.html>
More information about the INC-list
mailing list