[Esip-documentation] ACDD 1.3 Presentation - Highlights

John Graybeal jbgraybeal at mindspring.com
Sun Jan 4 16:53:37 EST 2015


I will be, remotely. Unless Anna would rather.

I tried that (highlights) in an email a few back.  So we have some, but not satisfying ones. Call it in progress.

John


On Jan 4, 2015, at 09:30, Ted Habermann <thabermann at hdfgroup.org> wrote:

> John et al,
> 
> Do we know who is giving the ACDD 1.3 presentation on Thursday?
> 
> Do we have a list of highlights of the new version?
> 
> Ted
> 
> ==== Ted Habermann ========================
> Director of Earth Science, The HDF Group
> Voice: (217) 531-4202
> Email: thabermann at hdfgroup.org
> ==== HDF: Software That Powers Science ====
> 
> From: "esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org" <esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org>
> Reply-To: John Graybeal <jbgraybeal at mindspring.com>
> Date: Thursday, January 1, 2015 at 11:58 PM
> To: "esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org" <esip-documentation at lists.esipfed.org>
> Subject: [Esip-documentation] ACDD convention version 1.3 is approved
> 
> Thank you to everyone who voted on the ACDD convention update.  The 1.3 version passed, with 11 votes in favor and 1 opposed.
> 
> I will take this moment to directly thank all of you who participated in this process. I hope it gives you, and all the users, some measure of satisfaction, as it has given us co-chairs. Thank you Anna for the opportunity to work together in this role!
> 
> Shortly, I will take the following steps, assuming no concerns are raised:
> - Update the front Category page, and the pointer from the main convention's URL, to reflect the current version is now 1.3
> - Add a few words to the Category page to reflect the stated desire of many principals to henceforth work on a groups-aware 2.0 version.
> - Create a new target page for the "ACDD Working" document, to serve as a placeholder for new proposals
>   - The 2.0 ACDD group can decide whether they want to work within that working document, or elsewhere
>   - In theory a few of the new proposals might be minor enough to be applied to 1.3, but it's likely 2.0 is the next significant change
> 
> Have I missed anything?
> 
> Below I have appended the list of votes, for validation.
> 
> Best wishes for a successful, interoperable, and prosperous New Year!
> 
> John
> 
> 
> Kelly Monteleone - Yes
> Heather Brown - Yes
> Ed Armstrong - Yes
> Ted Habermann - Yes 
> Bob Simons - Yes
> John Graybeal  - Yes
> Anna Milan - Yes
> Nan Galbraith - No 
> Philip Jones - Yes
> Aleksandar Jelenak - Yes 
> Mike McCann - Yes
> Ge Peng - Yes
> 
> 
> ---------------
> John Graybeal
> Project lead
> Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
> MMI Ontology Registry and Repository: http://mmisw.org/orr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------
> John Graybeal
> Project lead
> Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
> MMI Ontology Registry and Repository: http://mmisw.org/orr
> 
> 
> 
> 

John Graybeal
jbgraybeal at mindspring.com



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-documentation/attachments/20150104/e76f624c/attachment.html>


More information about the Esip-documentation mailing list