[Esip-preserve] Submitted sessions - physical objects

[Ruth Duerr]

Hi Denise,

I think the session proposal looks fine; but are you sure you need two full sessions?  I ask as the conference as a whole isn't that long and it is typically hard to maintain an audience for two full sessions (in other words they may end up being two of the same session with just different people for the most part).  If two full sessions are a mandatory requirement then I think there needs to be some way to make it clear whether people need to commit to both sessions or not.

Ruth

On Mar 29, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Denise Hills <dhills at gsa.state.al.us> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I've submitted two sessions to the commons relating to physical objects and requested that they go back to back. Please feel free to edit, add as lead (I don't need to do it by myself, but didn't want to commit anyone else!), etc. The links are:
> 
> Physical Object Preservation Challenges and Opportunities Part 1 - Do digital standards and practices work for physical objects?
> http://commons.esipfed.org/node/1467
> 
> Physical Object Preservation Challenges and Opportunities Part 2 - Can we make any recommendations for Data Collection Structure?
> http://commons.esipfed.org/node/1468
> 
> Thanks for your assistance!
> 
> 
> Denise Hills
> Acting Program Director, Energy Investigations
> Geological Survey of Alabama
> office (205) 247-3694
> cell (205) 239-8191
> dhills at gsa.state.al.us
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20130402/545cfc0a/attachment.html>