[Esip-preserve] NSF data management & sharing policies

[Arctur, David K]

Thanks Kerstin, Mark & Jeff. Not real surprising considering the number of moving parts and relatively new directives. But this will be tedious to track, much less enforce consistently, even with a registry of some kind. I could imagine a couple places where such a registry might find a home (ESIP? COPDESS?) but I’m not volunteering to do it. :)

Cheers, dka
—



On Apr 28, 2016, at 8:04 AM, Kerstin A Lehnert via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:

I know that within the Geoscience has is currently some assessment of data policies going on. I'll try to find out more.

Kerstin



On 4/28/16 09:02 AM, Parsons, Mark via Esip-preserve wrote:
And Polar does it yet another way. Indeed it varies from Program Officer to Program Officer. I don’t think there is any sort of NSF-wide assessment, but I could be wrong.

cheers,

-m.
On 27Apr2016, at 10:27 PM, Arctur, David K via Esip-preserve <esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:

Folks, I have some q’s related to data management policy requirements & oversight, would appreciate your feedback.

Reviewing the policies of the individual NSF Directorates shows variations in the policy - for example Geosciences permits for a 2-year hold period following collection<http://www.nsf.gov/geo/ear/2010EAR_data_policy_9_28_10.pdf> while Engineering which permits for 2-year hold following publication<http://nsf.gov/eng/general/ENG_DMP_Policy.pdf>. Even within Geosciences there is variation (e.g. Division of Ocean Sciences requirement to archive data in specific National Data Center).

Some questions that come up for me include:

  *   Which aspects of the current data management and sharing policy have been most effective and which aspects does the NSF hope to improve?
  *   How does the NSF monitor researchers' managing and sharing their data consistent with the policies and researchers' proposals?
  *   How much flexibility do PIs of ongoing research projects have in how they satisfy data management and sharing requirements, in relation to what they included in their proposal?
  *   Re: Engineering Directorate - I understand that data that could lead to commercialization is not subject to the publication requirement. Is this defined when a proposal is made? How has this been observed and used in practice?

Thanks for your help and thoughts on this.

Best, dka
—
David K Arctur
Research Scientist & Fellow, University of Texas at Austin



_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve




_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve



--
Dr. Kerstin Lehnert
Director, Interdisciplinary Earth Data Alliance
Director, EarthChem
President, IGSN e.V.

Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Columbia University
Palisades, NY, 10964
(845) 365-8506
http://www.iedadata.org<http://www.iedadata.org/>
http://www.earthchem.org<http://www.earthchem.org/>
http://www.igsn.org<http://www.igsn.org/>

<lehnert.vcf>_______________________________________________
Esip-preserve mailing list
Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org<mailto:Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org>
http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-preserve/attachments/20160428/215daf74/attachment-0001.html>