[esip-semantictech] apologies, your email is right there

[Beth Huffer]

John,

Lewis (or anyone else) can correct me if I'm wrong about this, but I 
believe that the word "stacks" in Section 2.2 is just referring to 
possible future technologies that we might want to champion as worthy of 
adoption by ESIP. I think the idea there is just that this first 
evaluation process, where we are evaluating two candidate ontology 
portals, may provide us with re-usable guidelines for evaluating other 
semantic web technology stacks in the future. So, my answer is "no, this 
particular evaluation is just about evaluating the two ontology portals. 
However, let's try to use this opportunity to create a repeatable 
process that we might use again to evaluate other technologies."

Beth



On 3/28/17 7:11 PM, John Graybeal via esip-semanticweb wrote:
> Beth,
>
> Yes, it took me two tries to find, but your email is right there where you sent it. (Long story. But I saw the email when you sent it.)
>
> I thought your answers were fine. I had every intention of adding details, but it hasn’t been an option in my life lately. C’est la vie!
>
> I noticed that you did not answer one question, “…  the document references semantic web technology *stacks* as an end goal of the STC.  Does this, together with the document title and the broad-ranging use cases, mean this upcoming evaluation is about more than simply the semantic repository implementation? “  Would appreciate understanding the expectations on that score.
>
> Thanks, and thanks for keeping this ball rolling!
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> esip-semanticweb mailing list
> esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticweb