[esip-semantictech] SWEET issues?

[Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)]

Hi Simon,
I’ve addressed your comments directly inline, so please see below…

    Hi folks -
    
    Trying to track down the current issue list relating to SWEET.
    On the GitHub site I find this: https://github.com/ESIPFed/stc/issues?q=is%3Aopen but it doesn't appear to have any content-related issues yet.

That’s not strictly true. Please note that more general SemTech Committee issues can be located at the link you’ve provided. SWEET is being dealt with in a different repository at
https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/
The open issues provide good overview of the type of things we are going to begin working on post ESIP Summer Meeting where we are hosting our first SWEET Ontology Interest Group meeting. It would be great if you could attend
http://sched.co/BJmK
We don’t have a GoTo meeting set up yet but we can *maybe* change this if it would be useful.
    
    For example, most of SWEET has no annotations - no labels, no comments, no definitions, no titles, etc.
    So meaning has to be gleaned from the axiomatization, which is OK for a reasoner but tough on a human.
    This is an overall style/practice issue, not a subject-matter-expert issue.

I complete agree. This is something which would really add value to the ontology suite as a whole. 
I also have a few issues which I am going to raise in parallel here on the list and at the lunchtime meeting this week. I would kindly ask that you open an issue at the SWEET Github repository I’ve provided above describing the ‘annotation issue’ as well as any suggestions for addressing the issue.
    
    At what point do you expect these to be fed into the process? Is there another document collecting fine-grained issues?

Specifically, with regards to SWEET we have two sources now.
• The canonical source lives at https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet
• The beginnings of a ‘specification’ document has been started at https://esipfed.github.io/stc/publishing-snapshots/FPWD-2017-06-28-SWEET/index.html, this will be incrementally updated throughout this week and afterwards. Right now it is just a placeholder based off of a W3C template. I’ve replied to your comments on the Github issue relating to this document.

Thanks for asking these questions. There is a bunch of work to do here and I think this week will be a huge step forward for us here.
Lewis