INC NEWS - DRAFT of March delegate meeting minutes
pat carstensen
pats1717 at hotmail.com
Mon Mar 28 07:23:56 EST 2005
Inter-Neighborhood Council
Making Better Neighborhoods
www.durhaminc.org
Minutes of Meeting of March 22, 2005
REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT
Ronnie Griffin, Garrett Farms
J. Clinton Rogers, Dunbarton
Lugenia Mason, River Forest
Anne Guyton, Colonial Village
Phyllis Cotton, Emorywood Orchards
Joan Miller, Emorywood Orchards
Charles Phillips, Emorywood Orchards
David Johnson, Chandler-Breedlove
Josh Parker, Trinity Park
Lynwood Best, Dept. of Housing and Community Development
Don Stauffacher, Marquis-Pierre
Bill Anderson, Duke Park
Michael Shiflett, Northgate Park
Cheryl Sweeney, NPNA
John Dagenhart, Trinity Park
Vicki Schneider, Woodlake HOA
Matt Yarbrough, DBAC
Randy Pickle, Forest Hills
Pat Carstensen, Cross County
Introductions President Bill Anderson opened the meeting. Members
introduced themselves.
20th Birthday Bash Last year we had twice as many people as expected at
the Neighborhood Heroes event, and this year we will also be honoring past
presidents. We will need to do better at communicating invitations. John
Dagenhart took on the job of getting addresses for past presidents so we can
invite them; Pat will send the current guess of the list to John, Anne
Guyton, Mike Shiflett and Bill.
Multi-Modal Transportation Center There will be a presentation about it at
the April meeting because of concerns raised about its cost per square foot,
maintenance cost, and fit with the downtown landscape.
Durham Businesses Against Crime Matt Yarbrough gave a presentation on the
history and activities of DBAC (http://www.durhampolice.com/dbac/). Some
things to do to make Durham safer:
1. Join Citizens on Patrol (COP) couple hours / month of driving around
and looking
2. Join Partners Against Crime (PACs)
3. Form / support Neighborhood Watch
4. Use Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Blockbuster
is least robbed chain because of how they design their stores. Criminals
are looking to avoid hassles and wont go where the environment is just too
transparent. Police (Eric Hester) will assess your home or business for
CPTED.
5. Get involved in legislative efforts such as more funding for SBI labs to
reduce turn-around times on evidence, more uniformity on bonding, and more
judges, etc.
6. Support Eyes and Ears Program Teach people who are routinely in
neighborhoods (taxi drivers, postal workers, meter readers, etc.) to be more
observant so they can report suspicious activities to the police.
Open and Green Space There was an update on the Duke Forest / Complete the
New Hope Creek Puzzle efforts. The issue shows that Durham needs to think
more systematically about preserving open space, entrances, and historic
lands. A letter to this effect was passed (see Attachment A) and will be
sent to council and the board of county commissioners.
Other Items
1. No-one had anything new to say about school impact fees. Pat will send
out a request for people to be on a committee to investigate the issue.
2. No-one was available to talk about fire station siting.
3. Update neighborhood contacts info by e-mailing neighbors at durham-cvb.com
or calling 680-8328. We will include this info in all agendas.
4. As of 3/11/05 we have $1044.28 in checking, $2224.46 in savings. Randy
has 5 checks totaling $125 to deposit. We approved Feb. minutes and
treasurers report.
5. UDO Committee needs to start meeting again.
6. CIP Update It looks like there will be bond referendums for
transportation (paving streets and adding sidewalks), parks, and building
"improvements" (making up for deferred maintenance). INC should probably
take some action to ensure that citizen involvement in this process happens
sooner rather than later.
7. Results-based Accounting Committees are looking at getting city / county
scorecards on whether Durham is making progress in the right direction.
They need more volunteers. Committee 8 is looking at organized and active
neighborhoods and would like INC as a partner in helping in this area. We
could do 1-on-1 help with new neighborhoods, skill-building workshops (e.g.
running effective meetings), and resources on the web site.
8. The yard waste letter was acknowledged by Cora and Diane. The rumor is
the city has a list of possible alternatives they are moving on so we may
need more political pressure to get appropriate citizen involvement in
making the choices.
9. Dues are due and letters will be going out shortly.
10. Ronnie Griffin asked for support in opposing a proposed re-zoning that
would put 284 housing units on 32.7 acres on Garrett Road. The high density
is supposed to be transit friendly, but is a long way from the future rail
right-of-way and getting to the current bus lines is dangerous. Traffic in
the area is now bad (intersection is the 2nd most dangerous in Durham) and
will get worse with construction of new Mud Creek bridges. There are also
problems from increased run-off to already flooded areas. The area also has
historic significance (there are over 700 identified archeological sites in
Durham but the locations are not public so most construction has a chance of
destroying something valuable).
The meeting was adjourned.
Attachment A: Open Space Letter
To: Mayor Bill Bell
Durham City Council
Commissioner Ellen Reckhow
Durham County Board of County Commissioners
From: Bill Anderson, President
Inter-Neighborhood Council of Durham
Date: 15 March 2005
RE: Preservation of Green and Open Space
On behalf of the Inter-Neighborhood Council of Durham (INC), I am writing to
express our concern regarding the issues raised most recently by the Erwin
Area Neighborhood Group (EANG). Because EANG is working very diligently to
lead the efforts to preserve land offered for sale in Duke Forest, INC has
decided not to take a specific position on the city and county purchase of
the land. However, after lengthy discussion among neighborhood leaders, INC
feels this is an important time to look at broader issues related to open
space, green space and parks.
Many neighborhood leaders have been very supportive of the efforts of EANG
as is the INC. Members of INC feel that this case points to broader issues
related to public policy for preservation of open space and green space,
especially with historic significance. Along these lines there has also
been discussion about policy which will maintain new spaces among the crunch
to maintain existing open space especially in the inner city.
The City of Durham has worked with existing resources to maintain existing
parks and open space. What is clear is that in the future the County
government and City government must do a better job coordinating how and
where new spaces will be preserved. Durham has a rich environmental texture
that many in this community are concerned is eroding under our noses. The
Comprehensive Plan talks about thinking creatively to find resources to
acquire new open space and parks, but there is little to nothing concrete.
The Erwin area land is a perfect example of land that our policy assumes
will always be open and green. As our area continues to grow we can not
pretend that open space will always be there and we can not continue to
neglect the space we currently have. We would like to see the city and
county work together to develop a plan that will:
<sum> Identify areas of significance in need of preservation for open and
green space.
<sum> Identify gateways to Durham and evaluate open space character.
<sum> Evaluate community values for open space (recreation, physical
attractiveness, historical character) as a way to prioritize needs.
<sum> Craft policy for adoption that will enforce preservation of identified
areas.
<sum> Develop guidelines that rate and allow purchase of major lands for
preservation not under conservation easement (ex. Duke Forest).
INC is more than willing to work with the city on a process that will
accomplish these goals. Please feel free to contact me so we can move
forward on this important issue facing our community.
Warmly,
Bill Anderson
/jmp
More information about the INC-list
mailing list