INC NEWS - Fw: [whhna-list] Dog poop/Waste collection rules
Deb Christie
dchristie1 at nc.rr.com
Tue Aug 16 23:49:30 EDT 2005
I read that the ideal is to flush the contents of doggie bags cat waste
scooped out of the litter down the toilet - many jurisdictions prohibit the
placing of meat-eating animals into landfills at all.
Deb Christie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike - Hotmail" <mwshiflett at hotmail.com>
To: <inc-list at durhaminc.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 2:34 PM
Subject: INC NEWS - Fw: [whhna-list] Dog poop/Waste collection rules
>
> Forwarded email posting from sender with permission.
>
> Please feel free to pass this along to your neighborhood listservs.
>
> mike
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Diane McKay" <nczephdog at yahoo.com>
> To: <whhna-list at rtpnet.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 8:49 AM
> Subject: [whhna-list] Dog poop/Waste collection
> rules
>
>
> Here's the scoop (groan) from the City of Durham re: dog waste collection.
> I spoke to a representative this morning:
>
> Dog waste should be double-bagged if it is to be collected curbside, for
> these reasons:
>
> If a small bag of doo falls out of the cart while the cart is being
> emptied into the truck, the agents will flip the little bag back into the
> cart and "green tag"
> the cart. These green tags outline the protocol that has been
> violated--in this case, "loose" garbage "improperly bagged." I'm sure I'm
> not the only
> one who has come home from work at the end of the collection day to find
> such a tag on my cart (and no, I do not leave my cart at the curb for days
> at a
> time to serve as an invitation for public dumping).
>
> This has happened to me on two occasions since I moved here in mid-June,
> which is why I posted my objections in the first place: I wound up
> fishing the rank
> little bags out of the bottom of the cart and placing them into a sealed
> kitchen bag so that they would be collected the following week.
>
> Here's another interesting tidbit from the city of Durham: animal waste
> is considered hazardous waste. It emits a high amount of fumes.
> Sometimes, when
> a truck returns to the transfer station, if its load is "too fumy," it
> triggers an alarm, and work must stop while the fumes are cleared.
> Double-bagging dog
> poo means that the fumes are lessened, which means that the workers can
> perform their jobs more efficiently (I also would imagine that they are
> grateful for
> anything we can do to make the jobs more pleasant).
>
> After the representative told me this, I was reminded that my friends at
> the Scrap Exchange plow through several tons of garbage every day looking
> for
> reusable materials. I wonder if double-bagging means less contamination
> of these materials.
>
> So: double-bagging is not only courteous to those neighbors who do not
> appreciate the little gifts left behind in their carts (any ideas about
> how to
> identify them that do and them that don't??), it is courteous to workers
> who have to endure tough working conditions as it is. It means work gets
> done more
> efficiently, too.
>
> If you have environmental objections to double-bagging, perhaps you would
> be interested in these products:
>
> http://www.ecoproducts.com/Home/home_biobags/home_index_biobags.htm
> Diane
>
> _______________________________________________
> INC-list mailing list
> INC-list at rtpnet.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/inc-list
More information about the INC-list
mailing list