INC NEWS - any cuts just has to hurt somewhere...

Fri Jun 6 15:48:11 EDT 2008

I am all for "user funded anything" as that does as you say, frees up
funding for other areas/problems/concerns. I guess the problem is that if
these organizations charged what it took to roll out their various
productions/shows/events, then they might find that they would no longer
be able to do so because it did not break even (or make financial sense).
I think that's what all of this about anyway. Getting all of these groups
either to become financially independent or fold. Some will make it while
others will fall by the wayside as unwanted and unsupported by the
community. I guess it depends on what "value" they bring to the table...

An example of this is our Yard Waste Program in the City. I'm not sure how
it works out today (not having a yard waste facility here in our community
and shipping it all off to VA; I have been assurred that one is coming
again soon...), but three years ago the Yard Waste Program was funded by
those who subscribed to the service and it was breaking even. So that was
a good thing for the tax payers. Here was a City service that was paid for
by those who wanted the service and not an expense born by anyone else. It
would be nice to see that sort of thought process across the board when it
comes to spending.

RWP
27 Beverly

> Fair point at the end, but an earmarked admissions tax is just a way of
> transferring the cost of the arts to the arts user, freeing up the
> general fund for the core responsibilities of government.  It is only an
> alternative to a method where the arts are left to wither or unfairly
> pitted against needs that must be supported by the general fund.
> Another way to look at it, do we really think the price of our ticket
> now is paying enough to provide the entertainment we're
> getting...no-way.
>
> But it was just an idea borrowed from other models of funding.  I'm open
> to anything but the approach we have now.
>
> RB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: inc-list-bounces at rtpnet.org [mailto:inc-list-bounces at rtpnet.org]
> On Behalf Of RW Pickle
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 11:32 PM
> To: inc-list at durhaminc.org
> Subject: INC NEWS - any cuts just has to hurt somewhere...
>
> There are a lot of projections used in the budgetary process. One of our
> questions is "can you get it done/started/completed in the coming budget
> cycle?" If not, it can wait. But from this, we see the wish lists that
> could trickle down into funding just about everything eventually. But it
> all costs real dollars.
>
> Barry is sort of right about something here. It does all boil down to
> Council (or Commissioners) deciding where they will spend the money and
> how much they will spend on any particular item. I can only hope that
> the
> countless hours spent by citizens that have volunteered their time in
> analyzing it, scoring it, and recommending what we all (and that must be
> a
> huge ALL, not just the Capital Improvement Group I'm in, but all
> citizens
> who volunteer trying to make the ends meet) think we need. Because most
> of
> these recommendations came from people who live all across this town and
> come to the table with many different backgrounds. One may support one
> thing very strongly while another may not value that particular thing.
> With many people voicing their opinion in the process, what we end up
> with
> is what we need (regardless if we want it or not; a synthesis by all
> means
> that as an average, it was more important if it rose to the top of the
> averaged list). We're currently spending a great deal on American with
> Disabilities Act compliance in our City. I remember when it was enacted.
> It's been a while and we still haven't gotten all this stuff done. Now
> we're in a rush because we'll be fined for not having it done. So we've
> short funded it for years until now, we have to get it done.
>
> Some things change (at least in the Capital Improvement budget) as this
> process moves forward. For example, if Greenfire takes over one of the
> parking decks and bears the cost of renovation, that'll free up $6.2M+
> and
> would allow 18 or 19 more projects to be funded in the CIP. That's still
> not down a half page in a 2 page list. And this is just on the short
> list
> we started with. Budget and Finance is trying to find more to cut before
> it makes it further into the process (as Council has asked).
>
> If we decided we were going to do a four year tax increase that would
> sunset at the end of the fourth year (for 4 times what we're currently
> looking at getting; say from $.15 to $.60-.75), we could get a great
> deal
> done with the influx of more funds. Even for that short of a time. But
> would it be enough to get it all done? Like I said, we don't even have
> the
> people it would take to deal with it all. And it would cost us all more
> if
> only just for a short time. Just as Council or Commissioners vote to
> increase taxes, they also must pay these fees since they live here as
> well.  And these increases in fuels, groceries, water, taxes, etc add up
> for a lot of people and make life yet more difficult. Especially those
> on
> fixed incomes.
>
> One thing we do need to do right now is to acquire debt. The City
> Council/Budget Office likes to keep our debt load around 12%. Money
> today
> has never been cheaper (in the amount we need to get things done) and
> while it's cheap, we need to increase this load to maybe 17-20%. So we
> need to bite the bullet, borrow more while it's cheap, and work our
> butts
> off getting stuff done. Last time I looked, it looked like there already
> is a lot going on. But seeing it all in numbers and projects, there's a
> lot left to do. And it doesn't seem to be getting any cheaper. Just look
> at fuel costs over the last year. The City has something like 1100
> vehicles it puts out on the road each day. The County has all those
> school
> busses (plus a fleet). Everyone buys fuel, so you know how much the cost
> has gone up. Just as an example, Solid Waste goes through more than 1200
> gallons of fuel a day! The budget we are working under now was fixed
> last
> year. So it's even short before we get to the next new budget to
> increase
> it. But that doesn't mean we've stopped needing fuel today and it must
> be
> paid for today as well. So we rob Peter to pay Paul (as the saying
> goes).
>
> I wouldn't say the budget process this year is a disgrace because it's a
> work in progress. And as long as I can remember, there has been a
> shortage
> of funds to make all the ends meet. So we have the same dance year after
> year. That's why, at least for Capital Projects, we're going to spend
> the
> next year developing a long-range plan so we can roll out funding yearly
> if necessary to get it all done.
>
> The sudden outcry by the NCA community is really moot. Like Barry said,
> why didn't it come up during the campaigns? It's been 2 years in the
> coming and like the panel I sit on (the CCIP), the arts funding was
> decided by citizens as well. They looked at the requests, like we look
> at
> the Capital Project requests, and decided what was important. So it's
> the
> community really deciding (at least up front) what it wants and needs.
> The
> final decisions will always be made by our elected officials... We can
> only hope they listen to us.
>
> The real disgrace is that there isn't enough money to go around for
> everything. But then again, there is no blank check in this process. If
> there were, I guess everyone would be happy... Or would they? It all has
> to be paid for some how and we're the ones paying for it (and that
> includes our elected officials and most of the folks who work for our
> municipality). Would you pay 4 times in property taxes right now just to
> make it all work? I doubt it. But it might just change the funding
> metrics
> enough so as to get it all done and we'll have some left for other
> things.
>
> I hated to hear an "admissions tax" mentioned in an earlier email. It
> just
> becomes another one of those hidden fees we end up paying especially
> when
> it comes to music in our City. There's a lot of competition in Durham;
> too
> much free music for many to want to pay for it, muchless pay an
> additional
> tax on it for admission. And that's a good thing. Free to all is what it
> should be. Like the Latin music in CCB Plaza this weekend. It's not a
> fee
> based event; the City (DPR) is throwing the party. The City still
> believes
> in the arts and here is an example of it. So get out and enjoy what your
> taxes are paying for! And at many of the other free music events held
> around the City this summer.
>
> RWP
> 27 Beverly
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INC-list mailing list
> INC-list at rtpnet.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/inc-list
>
> --
> OnPar ExchangeDefender Message Security: Click below to verify
> authenticity
> http://www.exchangedefender.com/verify.asp?id=m56Bm7xk009157&from=reyn@durham-cvb.com
>
>
>

====================================================================
This e-mail, and any attachments to it, contains PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL information intended only for the use of the addressee(s) or
entity named on the e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading,
dissemination or copying of this e-mail in error is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this electronic  transmission in error, please notify
me by telephone (919-489-0576) or by electronic mail (pickle at patriot.net)
immediately.
=====================================================================