[Durham INC] Appearance Commission votes in favor of digital billboards

[bragin at nc.rr.com]

That's a very interesting interpretation of the article, which states:

"Also Wednesday, just five commission members said they thought consideration should be given to the allowance of digital billboards under any possible text amendment. "

In other words, the appearance commission voted 8-6 in favor of a generic statement allowing some amendment to the UDO "if it results in the installation of more attractive signs and a reduction of quantity."  But it voted 9-5 against an amendment specifically allowing digital billboards.

How that can be interpreted as a vote "in favor of digital billboards" is beyond my ability to understand.

Barry Ragin
---- RW Pickle <randy at 27beverly.com> wrote: 

=============
To those who typically send out only one side of an issue, giving us all
the information makes for a better decision...
__________________________________________________________________________

BY MATTHEW E. MILLIKEN : The Herald-Sun
mmilliken at heraldsun.com
Jan 22, 2009

DURHAM -- The City-County Appearance Commission gave a mixed endorsement
Wednesday evening to an effort to give the billboard industry more
flexibility.

more:

http://heraldsun.southernheadlines.com/durham/4-1077085.cfm

___________________________________________________________________________

RWP
27 Beverly




_______________________________________________
Durham INC Mailing List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html