[Durham INC] October DRAFT minutes

Pat Carstensen pats1717 at hotmail.com
Sun Nov 6 11:16:47 EST 2011


If you have additions or corrections, please let me know.  Also, if anyone wants the nice WORD version of the minutes, just let me know that too.  Regards, pat

-----
















October
Delegate Meeting of the InterNeighborhood Council of Durham

First Presbyterian Church

October 25, 2011

 

Attending the meeting were:

Neighborhoods

Bay Pointe – Heather Myers

Colonial Village NA – Jonathan
Jones

Colony Park – Don Lebkes

Cross Counties – Pat Carstensen

Downtown Area – Mary W. Clemons

Duke Park – Bill Anderson, Ian
Kipp

Golden Belt – John Martin

Long Meadow – Pakis Bessias

Northgate Park – Mike Shiflett,
Nancy Kneepkens

Old East Durham – Chloe’
Palenchar

Old Farm – David Harris

Old North Durham – Peter Katz

Old West Durham – Brett Valley

Trinity Park – Julia
Borbely-Brown, Philip Azar

Tuscaloosa-Lakewood – Susan
Sewell 

Watts Hospital Hillandale – Tom
Miller, Mike Woodard

Woodcroft – Scott and Heidi
Carter

(Based on the Treasurer’s Report,
Appendix A, there were 13 paid neighborhoods, so need at least 9 “ayes” on
policy votes)

 

 

Visitors 

Will Wilson – Durham Open Space
and Trails 

Jim Wise – N & O

Steve Toler – Education
Referendum

Mark Ahrendsen – Durham
Transportation Department

Jay Reinstein – City of Durham

John Stinson

 

 

 

Tom Miller called the meeting to order, and members
introduced themselves.  

 

Jay Reinstein and John Stinson of the City of Durham gave an
update / demonstration of the new Strategic Plan & Performance Management Dashboard;
go to the Durham’s Got It page (http://www.durhamnc.gov/StrategicPlan/Goals)
and play around with it.  What you
don’t see is the processes to get quality data and the effort of the citizen
oversight committee that made sure it was easy to use.  The dashboard lets you drill down to
see how well Durham is doing on meeting the goals identified in the strategic
plan.  The County is just starting
on a similar effort and everyone agrees coordination is important.

 

Mark Ahrendsen of the Durham
Transportation Department gave an update on Alston Avenue.  Based on a lower traffic forecast at
least in the short term (next 10-15 years), NC-DOT’s new plan (it looks more
like Hillsborough Street in Raleigh):

·      
Eliminates right-only
turn lanes

·      
Uses “interim striping”
north of Main, so only 1 lane in each direction is for through traffic, with
the other for bike lanes and parking

·      
Makes shorter left-turn
lanes so more of the median is wide and grassy, not narrow and concrete

·      
Has neck-downs at some
intersections to keep traffic from passing in the parking area and give
pedestrians a shorter sprint across the chasm

They will begin purchasing right
of way next year.  Chloe’ Palenchar, giving the neighborhood perspective, said the new plan is
better but still not great.  They
would like to see details on the retaining walls, speed limits, etc.  The light-timing could be improved
now.  One of the big questions is
getting the zoning right so there will be cars parked in the parking areas,
going to businesses taking advantage of the “climate” folks hope will happen
here.

 

On the Education Local Sales and Use Tax, the big challenge
for proponents is that “education” isn’t in the referendum language because of
how the legislature wrote the rules. 
However, the Board of County Commissioners did pass a resolution
allocating the funds for the next 10 years.  We are losing the $6.2M “pot” of federal money that has
helped mitigate state cuts; the sales tax would mostly replace what has been
cut from the state.  See: www.co.durham.nc.us/departments/bocc/Bond_Issues/Education_and_Transi1.html


 

David Harris moved to approve
the resolution (Appendix B) on Education Tax Referendum, John Martin seconded,
and it passed with 1 “nay” and 3 “abstains.”

 

On the Open Space Planning
resolution, Trinity Park can only support the first point of the resolution,
but is OK with that one.  With that
comment, the body passed the resolution with 1 “nay” and 2 “abstains.”

 

On the Transit Tax Resolution,
Mike Shiflett moved, John Martin seconded the resolution and the body passed
the resolution with 1 “nay” and 2 “abstains.”

 

David Harris moved that a
committee should be formed to look at the issue of resolutions failing because
of abstaining neighborhoods.  Peter
Katz seconded the motion.  It
passed.  The committee will consist
of Peter Katz, John Martin, Nancy Kneepkens,
Scott Carter, David Harris, Philip Azar, and Tom Miller (chair). 

 

For officers for 2011-12, Philip
Azar moved and Bill Anderson seconded the following slate:

                        John
Martin                        President

                        Scott
Carter                          Vice
President

                        Pat
Carstensen             Secretary

                        Peter
Katz                         Treasurer

                        Mike
Brooks                         at-large

                        Ian
Kipp                         media
member

                        Susan
Sewell                        at-large

                        Tom
Miller                        Past
President

These were elected by
acclimation and John Martin took over as chair.

 

On the Neighborhood Hero Event,
we will keep working on it.

 

Bill Anderson gave an update on
the Duke Park Bathhouse.  Mike
Woodard has the idea of putting in new modular, but antique-looking,
bathrooms.  So nothing is happening
with the historic structure yet, but at least there are facilities in the park.

 

Given that our next meeting
would be 2 days before Thanksgiving, we decided to have the November meeting on
November 29th (5th Tuesday) and not have a December
meeting.  Someone needs to check
with the church on the space.

 

Old West Durham and WHHNA
reported that they were stunned at Planning Commission meeting with the news
that when property is re-zoned into new compact district zone, it will lose all
the Development-Plan conditions everyone worked so hard to develop.  The issue is going to Council on
December 19th.  (As
background, what they have been working on for Ninth Street is what goes into
the UDO on the rules for the zone; once these rules have been created once, the
hope is that they can applied in 5 other areas, with just needing to decide
what the various boundaries of areas are. 
For some of these 5 areas, assembling a team of neighborhood experts
will be very hard.)  Susan Sewell
moved and Peter Katz seconded forming a committee to look at this issue.   Members of the committee: Philip Azar
(chair), Tom Miller, Peter Katz, Eric Heidt, Susan Sewell, Matt Dudek.     

 

Other Neighborhood Reports and
announcements:

·      
A developer asked PAC2
about an economic development grant before going to neighborhoods.  Is this a new policy?  We will try to get more information
abou this.

·      
The old Y. E. Smith
school may be re-developed for the Maureen Joy Charter School.

·      
Historic Preservation
Presentation / Happy Hour at Full Steam on October 27.

·      
County Strategic Planning
Open Houses on November 3,10,17.

·      
Night of Lights: There
are 2 viewpoints on building in back-up weekend.  Pat will send out a website so people can see what their
neighbors are doing.  http://www.doodle.com/75gmduny7x7yb74c


 

The meeting adjourned.

 




Appendix A: Treasurer’s Report

INC’s current balance is: $3086.48

 

Dues have been paid by:

Fairfield (payment received this
month, pending deposit)

Golden Belt

Morehead Hill

Cross-Countries

Old West

Parkwood

Burch Ave

Colony Park

Duke Park

WHHNA

Tuscaloosa-Lakewood

Long Meadow

Woodcroft

Trinity Park

Magnolia Place

Old North Durham

Northgate Park

Downing Creek

Falcon Bridge

Old Farm

 

Please note: If you’re association
mailed a check this month it may not be reflected in the list until next
month.  If your neighborhood hasn’t paid yet, you can bring payment to the
monthly meeting for $25 (or more) or mail it to:

1110 Virginia Ave, Durham NC 27705,
care of Tom Miller. 

 

 

 

 




Appendix
B:  A Resolution by the InterNeighborhood Council of Durham on an Education
Tax Referendum

WHEREAS, state funding for education has
declined in recent years and money from the federal EdJobs programs has now run
out; and

WHEREAS, the estimated $9,000,000 raised by
a ¼ ¢ sales tax will cover approximately 150 in-classroom jobs, as well as some
debt service for previously passed school bonds, a much-needed expansion of
pre-K services for at-risk kids, and work-study and grant funds to students at
Durham Technical College; and

WHEREAS, approximately 50% of the tax will
be paid by people who shop in Durham County but do not live here; and

WHEREAS, many necessities, such as food,
rent, gas, and prescriptions, will not be taxed; and

WHEREAS, although the text of the ballot
referendum does not mention education, the Board of County Commissioners has
promised to dedicate the funds to education; and

WHEREAS, our neighborhoods benefit from a
strong school system;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by
InterNeighborhood Council of Durham through its delegates duly assembled that
the Education Tax Referendum should pass.

This _25th_ day of __October___, 2011

 

____________________________________

Thomas R. Miller

President
Appendix C:  A
Resolution by the InterNeighborhood Council of Durham on Urban Open Space Plan
Objectives

WHEREAS, the Durham City and County Planning
Department is undertaking the development of an Urban Open Space Plan, which
should provide the City with proper guidance for further decision-making
processes, including possible acquisition/preservation or development of those
areas deemed important to Durham’s quality of life and our environment; and

WHEREAS, general open space planning has
concentrated on aesthetic, recreational and wildlife benefits, and (as shown in
the background below), with urban open space we need to add health, social and
environmental benefits; and

WHEREAS, Durham has a certain amount of ad hoc
data laying out issues and opportunities for open space in downtown Durham, but
nothing like the scientifically designed collection that other cities are
doing; and

WHEREAS, many neighborhoods have a stake in
downtown Durham, and the recent history of Old North Durham Park has shown that
these interests can conflict;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the
InterNeighborhood Council of Durham by its delegates duly assembled that the
Durham City/County Planning Department’s development of Durham’s Urban Open
Space Plan should

1. Carefully consider the environmental
health and justice aspects, in addition to the more traditional aesthetic and
recreational aspects.

2. Create an environmental health survey
detailing the above issues

3. Pay close attention to process and
governance issues to manage / minimize conflicts over the resources.

This _25th_ day of
_____October____, 2011

 

 

_____________________________________

Thomas R. Miller

President

 

 

 




Appendix D:  A Resolution of
the InterNeighborhood Council of Durham Supporting a Sales Tax for Transit

WHEREAS, a transit system that will maintain our quality of life with
the projected growth in Durham County’s population, direct that growth in
smarter ways, give people more choices, realize social justice, and provide
good jobs, and

WHEREAS, this election season, Durham County is the first jurisdiction
in the state to hold a referendum to adopt a ½ cent sales tax to be used
exclusively to transit, since such referenda were authorized by the NC
legislature in 2009, and

WHEREAS, the referendum has to be preceded by development of a detailed
“financial plan” for how revenues will be spent to encourage mobility; this
plan calls for 3 phases – bus expansion, then commuter rail to Wake County, and
finally light rail to Orange County, and

WHEREAS, Durham County is especially critical for the regional transit
plan related to the financial plan: it sits midway between Orange and Wake
Counties, and commuters come and go from many directions into and through the
county.

Therefore, be it resolved that the InterNeighborhood Council of Durham
supports the passage of the Transportation Tax Referendum.

This 25th
day of October, 2011

BY THE
INTERNEIGHBOHOOD COUNCIL OF DURHAM

___________________________________

Tom
Miller

President

 

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20111106/e958f127/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the INC-list mailing list