[Durham INC] S. Durham Residential Cell Tower meeting: Oct 11, 2012 (7 PM, South Regional Library)

[Joshua Allen]

I want good cell phone coverage.  So who gets to decide where we have good
coverage and bad coverage?  You have to have a tower somewhere near you if
you want coverage at all, so are we just arguing whether that tower should
be next to a church or next to a strip mall?  Sorry, I don't know anything
about this case, but seems like a losing proposition to try and limit cell
phone coverage.  Best you can do is to make the cell tower less noticeable.
 Other than making it look like a pine tree, which I can understand you
might like or dislike, the only other option is to put it somewhere else.
 Where are the alternatives, and wouldn't someone else just have to look at
it there?


On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Brenda Howerton <
brendahowerton10 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi Melissa:
> I appreciate your invitation, however I have a conflict for Thursday
> night and will not be all to attend.
>
> Thanks,
> Brenda Howerton
>
>
> T*o:* Edward C. Harrison <ed.harrison at mindspring.com>
> *Cc:* brendahowerton10 at yahoo.com; inc-list at rtpnet.org;
> fatherstavroforos2012 at gmail.com; rbford at aim.com
> *Sent:* Monday, October 1, 2012 5:41 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Durham INC] S. Durham Residential Cell Tower meeting: Oct
> 11, 2012 (7 PM, South Regional Library)
>  **
>   Sorry...I didn't realize there was an official definition for the term
> 'mega-church'. I always associated it with either 1) very large church with
> over 500 members or 2) Church looking to make big money via large financial
> stakes (in real-estate and other investments). I meant the latter in
> reference to this church. A lot of churches are now buying lots of land in
> addition to the property for their actual church and making big money
> (which I presume is tax free) by developing. When I read about this church,
> I feared it may be one of these.****I will be more careful in my use of
> buzzwords in the future,****I am not directly involved in the immediate
> neighbors' anti-tower movement (just don't have the time to do everything,
> you know?), but I empathize with them and wanted to inform others that this
> controversy was going on. Neighbors should have some say regarding anything
> that is going to affect their line of sight (and thus their property
> values) from their house; in this case, some are truly concerned about
> unknown health implications as well.****Melissa (Rooney)******
>  **
> *From: *Ed Harrison <ed.harrison at mindspring.com>;
> *To: *
> *Cc: *Melissa Rooney <mmr121570 at yahoo.com>; Brenda Howerton <
> brendahowerton10 at yahoo.com>; INC <inc-list at rtpnet.org>; <
> fatherstavroforos2012 at gmail.com>; Richard Ford <rbford at aim.com>;
> *Subject: *Re: [Durham INC] S. Durham Residential Cell Tower meeting: Oct
> 11, 2012 (7 PM, South Regional Library)
> *Sent: *Mon, Oct 1, 2012 3:34:31 AM
> **
> The definition of a megachurch from the Hartford Institute for Religion
> Research:
> **
> "The term megachurch generally refers to any Protestant congregation with
> a sustained average weekly attendance of 2000 persons or more in its
> worship services."
> **
> http://hirr.hartsem.edu/megachurch/definition.html
> **
> I first looked this up when a group of constituents opposing a proposed
> 174-"cottage" student housing development (something being proposed monthly
> within about 3 miles of the UNC campus) brought in as an issue the traffic
> from what they called "the new megachurch" down the road.  The permit
> showed that church has a maximum of 278 seats, not a megachurch. If the
> church on Massey Chapel Road met the definition of a megachurch, we'd know
> that by now.
> **
> Isn't this a Board of Adjustment case?
> **
> Ed Harrison
> Chapel Hill Town Council Member
> 42-year Durham Co. resident
> **
>
>  On Sep 30, 2012, at 10:51 PM, Richard Ford wrote:
> **
>
> Melissa,
> **
> What sort of dog whistle or codeword  is the term "mega-church" .  It's
> not  included in cited article.
> **
> Dick
>      **
> On Sep 30, 2012, at 9:35 PM, Melissa Rooney wrote:
> **
>
>  More info on the controversial cell tower being installed by a
> mega-church (against neighbors' wishes) in South Durham:
>   **
>
> http://www.thedurhamnews.com/2012/05/29/212162/rules-limit-durham-cell-tower.html
> **
> On October 11, 2012 there is a meeting at South Regional library at 7:00
> p.m. The guest speakers (so far) are Mike Woodard and Brenda Howerton. The
> immediate neighbors request that anyone with any interest please attend in
> order to pack the room and get their voices heard. This meeting is very
> important to their efforts to stop this tower and future towers near
> residential areas. The media will be there to hear the residents/neighbors'
> side of the story. One neighbor has told me, "The leaders of the church
> have told their side which is very misleading."**
>
> Thanks for caring!
> Melissa (Rooney)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Durham INC Mailing List
> list at durham-inc.org
> http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>
> **
> _______________________________________________
> Durham INC Mailing List
> list at durham-inc.org
> http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>
>
> ****
>
> _______________________________________________
> Durham INC Mailing List
> list at durham-inc.org
> http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>
>


-- 
Joshua
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20121010/8052e3ff/attachment.html>