[Durham INC] Colony Park needs your help now and on Feb. the 9th
don lebkes
dll-sjl at frontier.com
Sat Jan 23 19:25:09 EST 2016
> Hi All
>
> I invite you all to come to the next Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday Feb. the 9th, 2016, starting at 5:30PM. The Planning Commission meeting is held at City Hall in the City Council Chamber. At this meeting, there will be a public hearing on cases A1500012 and Z1500031. This is a revision of the plan that failed at the Planning Commission in July of 2015 and was withdrawn by the developer. I live in the subdivision of Colony Park, which will be impacted by the plan. Colony Park is located by W Cornwallis Rd. and Welcome Rd. near the 15-501 intersection
> The new plan, like the old, doesn’t improve, enhance or fit into our area of Southwest Durham. The plan isn’t compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods and undervalues our neighborhoods with it’s lack design. This area to the east of Colony Park and north of Colony Hill can be designed so much better than the present plan. The present plan is a cookie cutter plan that you would expect to see at Brier Creek.
> The developer told us to look at their Pulte Park South Station development in Charlotte, NC, as a guide to what they plan to do to our area of Durham. That development is on line at http://www.pulte.com/communities/nc/charlotte/park-south-station/103569/index1.aspx There will be no town homes here but they tout four different types of single family home designs. Their style is called snout houses. I call them storage units (garages) with living quarters in the rear.
>
> When you look at Pulte Park South Station development that is planned in our neighborhood and compare it to Colony Park, Colony Hill, Duke Forest, Welcome Circle, you can understand the concept of Comprehensive Plan Policy 4.2.2a. Our homes are a variety of ranch and split level with many different design elements and located on different areas of the lot. This policy calls for a variability of lot sizes, housing types, and styles in new residential development to avoid monotony.
> Policy 4.3.2a calls for infill development to be compatible with surrounding existing development. Policy 4.3.3 expects that the design of a new development will be appropriate and compatible with its surroundings, and ”acting as a visual and functional asset to the nearby residential areas, and reinforcing the existing community character.”
>
> The Planning Department may approve the plan as it follows most of the regulations in the UDO. But it violates the Policies as stated above, and many others also found in the UDO. Why Policies have to take a second seat to regulations is hard to understand, when Policies should drive the regulations.
>
> A new development should be an asset to the neighborhoods, the City, and the County of Durham. We are proud to live in this area of Durham and want the new development to make the neighborhood Durham proud. The new proposal won’t make anyone proud.
> Please write the Planning Commissioners saying that Durham deserves a better plan. One that follows the policies of the UDO and it’s spirt. Please come to this meeting, bring your family, friends and neighbors. You can make a difference and have in the past. Let’s do it again.
>
> Don Lebkes
> Colony Park
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20160123/128b5c51/attachment.html>
More information about the INC-list
mailing list