[Durham INC] Outcome of SCAD hearing?

[Mimi Kessler]

It HAS been going on a long time for THEM: there were two presentations to
JCCPC prior to the August 30, 2022 meeting when the general public was
invited. The proponents have been working on it for several years. And they
have made adjustments to it based on feedback from the PD and JCCPC. But
the fact that they made law that they did not have an understanding of its
content before they voted was reckless.

On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:36 AM Stephen Knill <knillsj at gmail.com> wrote:

> My most important takeaway was the “fours” constant reference to needing
> to vote on something last night.  Their rationale was that this had gone on
> too long. For whom?
> It seems they felt they owed the Proponents a vote. Why?
>
>
> Stephen Knill
> Mobile +1 917 620 4941 <+1%20917%20620%204941>
> knillsj at gmail.com
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 21, 2023, at 9:18 AM, Mimi Kessler <mimikessler1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Sure. But we all have to review the recording to have any idea.
>
> The two new council people were there in chambers the whole time. But I
> doubt they could keep up with Johnson's rattled-off numbers. Instead of
> conferring with colleagues, she sat in her seat preparing all of what she
> said. She is the puppeteer and while she will not be on council after last
> night, she has promised she will still "run things".
>
> And lots of people left last night saying that they would have voted
> differently if they had seen what they saw last night. Jim Anthony was
> brilliant in postponing the vote until after the election.
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:08 AM Elizabeth Conroy <conroyliz at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> At next week’s INC meeting, can we discuss the problematic items that
>> passed so we can ask new Council members to bring up some items again?
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 21, 2023, tom miller <miller.tom2022 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> They passed all but a handful of provisions
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* INC-list <inc-list-bounces at lists.deltaforce.net> *On Behalf Of *Elizabeth
>>> Conroy
>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 21, 2023 8:05 AM
>>> *To:* inc-list at lists.deltaforce.net
>>> *Subject:* [Durham INC] Outcome of SCAD hearing?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can someone tell me the outcome of the SCAD hearing last night?  I left
>>> at the break at 11 pm before Council members discussed and voted.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you, Liz Conroy, Colony Park
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Liz Conroy, Ed.D.
>>> 919-493-1238 (H) 919-564-6179 (C)
>>>
>>> conroyliz at gmail.com
>>> 2811 Welcome Dr.
>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/2811+Welcome+Dr.+Durham,+NC+27705?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>> Durham, NC 27705
>>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/2811+Welcome+Dr.+Durham,+NC+27705?entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Liz Conroy, Ed.D.
>> 919-493-1238 (H) 919-564-6179 (C)
>> conroyliz at gmail.com
>> 2811 Welcome Dr.
>> Durham, NC 27705
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> INC Website: https://sites.google.com/view/durhaminc/
>>
>> Durham INC Mailing List
>> inc-list at lists.deltaforce.net
>> https://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/inc-list
>>
>
>
> --
> Mimi Kessler
> 919-599-2892
> "Democracy is not a spectator sport" - John Deen
> Please vote every chance you get.
>
> _______________________________________________
> INC Website: https://sites.google.com/view/durhaminc/
>
> Durham INC Mailing List
> inc-list at lists.deltaforce.net
> https://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/inc-list
>
>

-- 
Mimi Kessler
919-599-2892
"Democracy is not a spectator sport" - John Deen
Please vote every chance you get.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20231121/f5d481f5/attachment.htm>