[Durham INC] Fw: Beach bungalow bailout
scjdurham at aol.com
scjdurham at aol.com
Mon Feb 28 13:59:42 EST 2011
Melissa,
I so agree with you on that. One year after the disasters from
Hurricane Katrina, FEMA in it's infinite wisdom changed the flood zone
rating for the area around Ellerbe Creek near Club Boulevard in
Northgate Park. I have always been required to have flood insurance
even though my house, built in 1942, has never flooded in 69 years.The
flood insurance premium increased by 300%.
I am in the process of applying for an exception (LOMA) and hope it
works because that 300% increase just doesn't fit the budget and is not
realistic since Ellerbe Creek has had extensive restoration and other
work provided by NCDOT (because of the widening). Our zone designation
should have gone in the other direction to less severe.
Cheryl, don't even have the 2 cents anymore, Shiflett
-----Original Message-----
From: Melissa Rooney <mmr121570 at yahoo.com>
To: inc-list <inc-list at rtpnet.org>; durhamenviro
<durhamenviro at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Feb 28, 2011 12:28 pm
Subject: [Durham INC] Fw: Beach bungalow bailout
Please see below and take the literally 10 seconds to let your
legislators know your opinion regarding facilitating buildings on the
sea shore. Our house is just a few inches inside the 100 year flood
plain (and that's just the first brick of the empty crawlspace), but
FEMA requires me to purchase flood insurance and will not even consider
an exemption. An insider tells me this is not so much to protect my
home/investment, but to provide funding for those that are in areas
more likely to be affected by flooding, like beach houses. It is unfair
to require environmentally appreciative and responsible, middle class
people like myself to fund repair costs for the beachside vacation
homes of people wealthier and less environmentally responsible than
myself.
Just my ten cents ;-)
Melissa Rooney
From:
Brittany Iery, NC
Conservation Network <publicalerts at ncconservationnetwork.org>;
To:
<mmr121570 at yahoo.com>;
Subject:
Beach bungalow
bailout
Sent:
Mon, Feb 28, 2011
3:52:53 PM
Hi Melissa,
If state legislators pass Senate Bill 110, it would undo a 25-year-old
ban on hardened structures on our beaches. This critical protection has
helped to make our barrier island beaches the envy of the nation.
This bill is scheduled to be up for debate in a key state Senate
committee tomorrow and we need your help to tell your legislators to
oppose SB 110 and any rollbacks to our state's beach protection laws.
While hardened structures, such as jetties and groins, may retain sand
near the homes and property in their vicinity, the structures also have
been found to increase erosion in areas further down the beach.
The Jersey shore is a prime example of the consequence of using these
hardened structures. Its coast now shows the devastating effects on the
shoreline (see photo).
Not only is this bill bad for the health of our beaches, it also allows
state funds for these hardened structures, which can cost as much as
$10.8 million to build and $2.25 million to maintain each year. At a
time when our legislators should be worrying about a $2.4 billion
deficit, it is unbelievable that they want North Carolinians to fund a
multi-million dollar beach bungalow bailout.
Tell your legislators to protect North Carolina’s beautiful and natural
beaches by not allowing hardened structures on our coast.
Thanks,
Brittany Iery
NC Conservation NetworkBecome a "fan" of the NC Conservation Network
and tell your Facebook friends about the latest issues, events, and
actions to protect North Carolina's air, land, and water. Click here to
become a fan or click here to create a Facebook profile.Invite your
friends and family to receive these action alerts, or help support our
work by donating online today!19 East Martin St., Suite 300, Raleigh,
NC 27601 / 919.857.4699 / info[at]ncconservationnetwork.org To
Unsubscribe Click Here
_______________________________________________
Durham INC Mailing List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
More information about the INC-list
mailing list