[Durham INC] Durham considering 'Development Agreements': Why is this a b...
TheOcean1 at aol.com
TheOcean1 at aol.com
Fri Mar 11 14:48:06 EST 2011
A growing pet peeve of mine is folks who post without signing their name.
Melissa always signs her emails, but who sent the original?
Bill Anderson
In a message dated 3/11/2011 12:33:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
mmr121570 at yahoo.com writes:
Please consider the information below, which I just received today. And
please consider contacting your local gov't officials (city council and board
of county commissioners) about this important issue...before it's too late
(once again). It'd be good to close this barn door BEFORE the horse gets
away, for a change...
I hope the INC and other local citizen organizations will consider passing
resolutions to the CC and BOCC regarding this issue as soon as possible.
Melissa (Rooney)
----- Forwarded Message ----
To: durhamzones at googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, March 10, 2011 10:03:40 PM
Subject: [DZP] Development Agreements
Friends,
It has come to my attention that Durham is considering allowing
development agreements. Why are these bad? These agreements are potentially a
loophole to get out of the Falls and Jordan Lake rules. The developers would
be allowed to use existing regulations at the time of the agreement…not
newly passed ordinances.
State law seems like it is in contradiction, because it allows the
development agreements. The whole point of the agreement is to lock in the
current rules. It doesn’t allow for any adjustments for future changes even if
they know it is coming. Municipalities would be enthusiastic about getting
more development to increase tax base, unless it is their own water supply
watershed.
The discussion on development agreements can be found here.
_http://www.ci.durham.nc.us/departments/planning/pdf/jccpc_010511.pdf_
(http://www.ci.durham.nc.us/departments/planning/pdf/jccpc_010511.pdf) Scroll
down to page 24
A recent K&L Gates newsletter encourages development agreements. We
wonder how much of a hand they had in this. It was written by Bill Brian,
Patrick Byker, and Craigie Sanders.
_http://www.klgates.com/newsstand/Detail.aspx?publication=6867#north_
(http://www.klgates.com/newsstand/Detail.aspx?publication=6867#north)
As a side note: Durham is basing the allowance of development agreements
on these “Additional Materials”. Who provided these “Additional Materials”
?
Another interesting side note regarding these samples of development
agreements:
1. Catawba County-Crescent Resources went bankrupt.
Who knew that Duke Energy did developments?
_http://www2.mooresvilletribune.com/news/2009/may/06/bankruptcy-possible-crescent-resources-ar-2712/_
(http://www2.mooresvilletribune.com/news/2009/may/06/bankruptcy-possible-crescen
t-resources-ar-2712/)
This was one of them. It was right on the lake.
_http://www.catawbacountync.gov/depts/planning/development/exhibitb.pdf_
(http://www.catawbacountync.gov/depts/planning/development/exhibitb.pdf)
2. Polk County-Bright’s Creek Holdings decided to change the terms of
their agreement after it was rezoned. What is the point of even doing
agreements if you can just change them?
_http://www.polknc.org/departments/development/documents/21011PBmtgpacket.pd
f_
(http://www.polknc.org/departments/development/documents/21011PBmtgpacket.pdf)
3. Henderson County-Seven Falls LLC Bankrupt, violated environmental
regs, with a “class action that claims a bank and developer defrauded
buyers who invested more than $50 million…”.
_http://foreclosureblues.wordpress.com/2011/02/09/seven-falls-class-claims-bank-developer-rolled-them/_
(http://foreclosureblues.wordpress.com/2011/02/09/seven-falls-class-claims-bank
-developer-rolled-them/)
_http://www.mountainx.com/blogwire/2010/hendersonville_daily_seven_falls_has
_caused_enough_trouble_
(http://www.mountainx.com/blogwire/2010/hendersonville_daily_seven_falls_has_caused_enough_trouble)
This is what Durham is considering basing their development agreements on?
_______________________________________________
Durham INC Mailing List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20110311/b726a356/attachment.html>
More information about the INC-list
mailing list