[Durham INC] 'Anti-Gay' is offensive language

[Christine Chamberlain]

It's offensive that the only opinion allowed on this list serve is the gay opinion.

 
Christine Chamberlain


________________________________
From: "TheOcean1 at aol.com" <TheOcean1 at aol.com>
To: christinebbd at yahoo.com; inc-list at rtpnet.org
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Durham INC] 'Anti-Gay' is offensive language


What I find offensive is someone telling me what I can discuss, and what I 
can't.
Since you take offense, or feel threatened by, so many of the comments 
here, perhaps this isn't the best listserv for you, Christine.
 
eeeeeBill Anderson
 
In a message dated 9/15/2011 12:22:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
christinebbd at yahoo.com writes:
If this list-serve wants to go back on topic, I suggest you halt  all discussion on the gay marriage amendment, whether it be in support of  banning gay marriage or against it.
>
>
>Many of you have made offensive remarks that don't belong in a  homeowner list serve.  Your offensive remarks are what spurred me to  speak up in the first place.
>
>
>STOP the discussion of anti-gay marriage, period.  The letter  you sent had no business being sent in the first place.
>
> 
>Christine Chamberlain
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Christine Chamberlain  <christinebbd at yahoo.com>
>To: "listserv, inc"  <inc-list at durhaminc.org>
>Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 12:15  PM
>Subject: Re: [Durham INC]  Anti-Gay is offensive language
>
>
>Joshua, Please refrain from describing those who differ with your  opinion on gay marriage as anti-gay.  It is offensive.
>
>
>
>Personally, I am NOT anti-gay.  I am anti-gay marriage, I am  NOT anti-gay.
>
> 
>Christine Chamberlain
>
>________________________________
> From: Joshua Allen  <allen.joshua at gmail.com>
>To: "listserv, inc"  <inc-list at durhaminc.org>
>Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 8:48  AM
>Subject: [Durham INC]  Anti-Gay Amendment to be on Ballot in May
>
>I know we are done 
  debating the topic, but I just wanted to update everyone on where the 
  amendment stands.  It passed both houses of state congress with the 
  3/5th's majority it needed.  So the amendment will be on the ballot -- in 
  the Republican primary -- in May!  So this amendment is clearly going to 
  pass. 
>
>I do see a few silver linings: The amendment only got 30 out of  50 votes in the senate, the minimum it needed to pass.  1 vote would have  made all the difference!   The Republicans are so uncertain that the  amendment will get a majority vote that they scheduled it for the May  Republican Primary, when few Democrats will go the polls, all but ensuring  passage of the amendment, which needs a simple majority to pass.  This  shows that they are scared because attitudes are changing to support marriage  equality.  Finally, the last silver lining is that court cases from other  states are on their way to the US Supreme Court which may nullify this  amendment if it passes.
>
>
>-- 
>Joshua
>
>
> 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Durham 
  INC Mailing List
>list at durham-inc.org
>http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Durham 
  INC Mailing 
  List
>list at durham-inc.org
>http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20110915/70bead11/attachment.html>