[Esip-preserve] DataCite to require "landing pages"

[Bruce Barkstrom]

Bravo - interesting and useful question.

In my mental model, assume three production paradigms:
1.  Exploratory (exemplified by a proposer with 2 grad students and
a 3-year grant)
2.  Operational (exemplified by a numerical weather generation
latency requirement of six hour maximum wait - but a lot of data
and no resources for reprocessing)
3.  Climate (exemplified by a data product suite with an indefinite
latency, but with low errors if you don't mind waiting six months to
a year).

Each of these paradigms has a different expectation for "manageable
size" collection of files.

Bruce B.

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Tom Moritz <tom.moritz at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just wondering out loud? -- is it possible / desirable to identify a
> "manageable sized" set of data as a canonical "test bed"
> and produce instances of the full range of options for treatment /
> presentation/ access?
>
> Has this been done? (Or can we point to such an example that we consider
> fully exemplary in this way?)
>
> Tom
>
> Tom Moritz
> 1968 1/2 South Shenandoah Street,
> Los Angeles, California 90034-1208  USA
> +1 310 963 0199 (cell) [GMT -8]
> tommoritz (Skype)
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/tmoritz
>
> “Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει” (Everything flows, nothing stands still.)
> --Heraclitus
> "It is . . . easy to be certain. One has only to be sufficiently vague." --
> C.S. Peirce
> "Kathambhutassa me rattindiva vitipatanti" (“The days and nights are
> relentlessly passing; how well am I spending my time?”)  -- "Ten Subjects
> for Frequent Recollection by One Who Has Gone Forth"
> "Il faut imaginer Sisyphe heureux."  ("One must imagine Sisyphus happy.") --
> Camus
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Mark A. Parsons <parsonsm at nsidc.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29 Feb 2012, at 3:12 PM, Greg Janée wrote:
>>
>> > Actually, I should rephrase the above.  I don't have a problem with
>> > DataCite; I just think they're taking themselves out of the identifier
>> > marketplace.  The persistent identifiers that point to data just won't be
>> > DOIs.
>>
>> I don't think I have a problem with that :-)
>>
>> But just to clarify my perception of the ESIP Guidelines: Citations should
>> point to landing pages. That does not imply that all DOIs, let alone other
>> identifiers. need to point to landing pages. Landing pages should ultimately
>> be both human and machine readable.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -m.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Esip-preserve mailing list
>> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
>> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Esip-preserve mailing list
> Esip-preserve at lists.esipfed.org
> http://www.lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-preserve
>