[esip-semantictech] sweet:Experiment and software on which SWEET is built
Justin Goldstein - NOAA Affiliate
justin.goldstein at noaa.gov
Wed Sep 13 12:10:53 EDT 2017
Thanks, Lewis. Regarding "experiment," do we have a formal
definition/comment, or just a demarcation of the relationship between it
and "Investigation?"
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 20:06:51 +0000
> From: "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)" <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney at jpl.nasa.gov>
> To: "esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org"
> <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>
> Subject: Re: [esip-semantictech] sweet:Experiment and software on
> which SWEET is built
> Message-ID: <961BED54-3C40-4519-B260-C3F0D14DD38B at jpl.nasa.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Justin,
> Yes SWEET does. It is included in the following Class definition
> https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/blob/bed0f79b2f5495a7c713000a7caeff
> dd5eb1c9d0/humanResearch.ttl#L35-L36
> As you can see it defined as follows
>
> <http://sweetontology.net/humanResearch#Experiment> a owl:Class ;
> rdfs:subClassOf <http://sweetontology.net/
> humanResearch#Investigation> .
>
> You can use Prot?g? for loading and working with SWEET. It is widely used,
> open source (BSD) and has a big community
> https://protege.stanford.edu
> https://protege.stanford.edu/community.php
>
> Simon Cox recently mentioned some alternative Editor AFAIK. You can find
> the name through the Github issue tracker. There may be others.
> Lewis
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:24:51 -0400
> From: Justin Goldstein - NOAA Affiliate <justin.goldstein at noaa.gov>
> To: esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org
> Subject: [esip-semantictech] sweet:Experiment and software on which
> SWEET is built
> Message-ID:
> <CAJuJXXncqiDJChjRAv4mc01A1oRe9EvOPeLiRcM6z0W=mUOqcw at mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi everyone,
> Have we reached the stage where we have a definition of "Experiment"
> in
> the SWEET ontology?
>
> Also, on which software is SWEET built? I ask because for purposes
> of
> identifying a good, efficient piece of ontology development software
> that
> may be approved for use by other government agencies.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 07:38:46 +0000
> From: <Simon.Cox at csiro.au>
> To: <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney at jpl.nasa.gov>,
> <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>
> Subject: Re: [esip-semantictech] sweet:Experiment and software on
> which SWEET is built
> Message-ID:
> <1e21a93f053d4e20bf3f3eabfc5ffa97 at exch1-mel.nexus.csiro.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> That class is defined in the 'HumanResearch' module.
> Does that mean 'human research' as in medical and social sciences?
> Or 'human research' as in 'human activities, this being research
> activities'?
>
> I usually use TopBraid Composer.
> It is an Ecplise-based RDF IDE - not as OWLy as Prot?g?, but quite easy to
> use.
> TBC is maybe a bit easier when working with a mixture of classes and
> individuals.
> Prot?g? kinda pushes you towards the classist approach.
> But Prot?g? has improved a lot in the last couple of years,
>
> Simon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: esip-semanticweb [mailto:esip-semanticweb-bounces at lists.esipfed.org]
> On Behalf Of Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) via esip-semanticweb
> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September, 2017 06:07
> To: esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org
> Subject: Re: [esip-semantictech] sweet:Experiment and software on which
> SWEET is built
>
> Hi Justin,
> Yes SWEET does. It is included in the following Class definition
> https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/blob/bed0f79b2f5495a7c713000a7caeff
> dd5eb1c9d0/humanResearch.ttl#L35-L36
> As you can see it defined as follows
>
> <http://sweetontology.net/humanResearch#Experiment> a owl:Class ;
> rdfs:subClassOf <http://sweetontology.net/
> humanResearch#Investigation> .
>
> You can use Prot?g? for loading and working with SWEET. It is widely used,
> open source (BSD) and has a big community
> https://protege.stanford.edu
> https://protege.stanford.edu/community.php
>
> Simon Cox recently mentioned some alternative Editor AFAIK. You can find
> the name through the Github issue tracker. There may be others.
> Lewis
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:24:51 -0400
> From: Justin Goldstein - NOAA Affiliate <justin.goldstein at noaa.gov>
> To: esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org
> Subject: [esip-semantictech] sweet:Experiment and software on which
> SWEET is built
> Message-ID:
> <CAJuJXXncqiDJChjRAv4mc01A1oRe9EvOPeLiRcM6z0W=mUOqcw at mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi everyone,
> Have we reached the stage where we have a definition of "Experiment"
> in
> the SWEET ontology?
>
> Also, on which software is SWEET built? I ask because for purposes
> of
> identifying a good, efficient piece of ontology development software
> that
> may be approved for use by other government agencies.
>
> _______________________________________________
> esip-semanticweb mailing list
> esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticweb
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> esip-semanticweb mailing list
> esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticweb
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of esip-semanticweb Digest, Vol 102, Issue 4
> ************************************************
>
>
--
________________________
Justin Goldstein, Ph.D.
Research Analyst
NOAA Technology, Planning and Integration for Observation (TPIO)
Employed By Riverside Technology
- 1335 East-West Highway Room 5133
- Silver Spring, MD 20910
-
(301) 427-2564
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-semanticweb/attachments/20170913/09e095ac/attachment.html>
More information about the esip-semanticweb
mailing list