[esip-semantictech] schema.org, roadmap, symposium matters

Thu Oct 18 11:32:22 EDT 2018

Will do , and will share here on the mailing list. thanks --Adam

On 10/18/18 11:29 AM, Beth Huffer wrote:
>
> Lewis, Adam,
>
> Thanks so much for your inputs. I really appreciate it. Yes, Adam, I 
> would love to see your ideas for US2TS and the ESIP Winter meeting. Do 
> you want to start a couple of Google docs?
>
> Beth
>
> *From: *esip-semanticweb <esip-semanticweb-bounces at lists.esipfed.org> 
> on behalf of Semantic Tech Committee <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>
> *Reply-To: *Adam Shepherd <ashepherd at whoi.edu>
> *Date: *Thursday, October 18, 2018 at 8:30 AM
> *To: *Semantic Tech Committee <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [esip-semantictech] schema.org, roadmap, symposium matters
>
> Hi folks, thanks for getting his started on all the many fronts!
>
> I would agree with Lewis about a schema.org <http://schema.org> 
> session at US2TS. It might be nice to look at how to properly extend 
> schema.org <http://schema.org> in that context as it might draw Dan 
> Brickley and/or Natasha to attend. I was thinking we could briefly 
> review a successful extension (GS1), propose some extensions from the 
> geosciences (improving temporal coverage of Dataset - with OWL Time, 
> SWEET,) and use mode of the time brainstorming on the mechanics of the 
> extension (how best to link into schema.org <http://schema.org> core 
> classes and properties) and constructing the data model for the 
> extension (identify the new classes and properties needed to describe 
> temporal coverage needs.
>
> For ESIP winter meeting, I was thinking in advance of US2TS, we might 
> propose more along a workshop session for building out the data model 
> for this dataset temporal coverage model and/or describing data access 
> APIs (as opposed to the static datasets schema.org <http://schema.org> 
> describes).
>
> If anyone doesn’t object, I’d be happy to write up both.
>
> Best, Adam
>
> -- 
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Adam Shepherd email:ashepherd at whoi.edu <mailto:email:ashepherd at whoi.edu>
> Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution voice: 508.289.2772
> MS #36, Shiverick ORCID: 0000-0003-4486-9448
> Woods Hole, MA  02543
>
> Technical Director
> Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office
> Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashep15/
> https://www.bco-dmo.org
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 17, 2018, at 6:38 PM, Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) via 
> esip-semanticweb <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org 
> <mailto:esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Beth,
>     You're absolutely right, there is a lot going on!
>     Please see inline for some of my contributions... more to come in
>     due course.
>
>        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>        Message: 1
>        Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:01:53 +0000
>        From: Beth Huffer <beth at lingualogica.net
>     <mailto:beth at lingualogica.net>>
>        To: ESIP-semanticweb <esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org
>     <mailto:esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>>
>        Subject: [esip-semantictech] schema.org <http://schema.org>,
>     roadmap, symposium matters
>        Message-ID:
>     <D8CECF46-3181-4968-A5E1-3FCB4C9556C6 at lingualogica.net
>     <mailto:D8CECF46-3181-4968-A5E1-3FCB4C9556C6 at lingualogica.net>>
>        Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>        Hello Sem Techies,
>
>        We are a busy committee and I need your help to keep things
>     moving. Here?s what we?ve got going:
>
>
>          1.  Our AGU abstract was accepted as an eLightening session.
>     An iPoster will need to be created and I hope to get inputs from
>     everyone for this. I?ll put together a rough (very rough) draft of
>     a poster and put it on Google Slides for people to comment
>     on/contribute to.
>
>     Excellent. I'll contribute once the bones are there.
>
>          2.  At our last meeting, we talked about possibly submitting
>     a session proposal for the U.S. Semantic Technologies Symposium
>     2019. Proposals are due Oct 31. Please take a look at the website
>     at http://us2ts.org/2019/ and email the list if you have ideas for
>     a session that you?d like to submit.
>
>     I think this is a good suggestion yes. The CfP is available at
>     http://us2ts.org/2019/posts/cfp.html
>     <http://us2ts.org/2019/posts/cfp.html> and I would suggest that
>     anyone interested take a look at it. Their guidelines state that a
>     suitable balance of participants is 3 with each preferably being
>     from a different institution. If we can align on a topic for our
>     session, then I doubt we will struggle to meet these guidelines.
>
>     I suggest that we propose one of the following
>     * a panel discussion focused on discussing the Semantic Web
>     Infusion Roadmap and Hype Cycle
>     (https://esipfed.github.io/stc/Semantic_Tech_Roadmap/SemanticTechRoadmap.html).
>     This would cover generalities such as fundamental Semantic
>     Technologies but would be skewed towards the Earth Science's to
>     make it a bit more interesting hopefully, OR
>     * Breakout-style discussions on a proposed topic with that topic
>     being use of established vocabularies (schema.org
>     <http://schema.org>) for improving data discovery across the
>     sciences. This would provide some continuity on the underlying
>     theme of this year's GeoSemantics Symposium we will be hosting in
>     January as well as an AGU Session on a very similar topic.
>
>          3.  Speaking of symposiums, we need to plan for the 2019
>     Geosemantics Symposium in January. Please submit your ideas for
>     themes and guest speakers for this symposium to the list.
>
>     I went ahead and created a staging area for our content and we
>     move forward.
>
>     https://esipfed.github.io/stc/symposium/2019/symposium.html
>
>     As a theme, I suggest we stick with "... use of established
>     vocabularies e.g. schema.org <http://schema.org>, for improving
>     data discovery across the sciences."
>     The reason I propose that we stick with a common theme is that it
>     is beginning to gain acceptance. To put it into the terminology
>     used by Peter Fox during his Hype Cycle presentation, schema.org
>     <http://schema.org> has entered the Plateau of Productivity! My
>     feeling is that if we stick with it, we could make some serious
>     impact.
>
>     Lewis
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     esip-semanticweb mailing list
>     esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org
>     <mailto:esip-semanticweb at lists.esipfed.org>
>     https://lists.esipfed.org/mailman/listinfo/esip-semanticweb
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.esipfed.org/pipermail/esip-semanticweb/attachments/20181018/11ade7fe/attachment.html>