INC NEWS - Re: INC NEWS

[Richard Mullinax]

Bill,

I do not see there is ever a conflict in talking about an issue. I will 
not keep issues from the PAC floor. Chief Chalmers said if all the 
community concerns were laid in maps on the map of our crime, the crime 
would not be visible. It is all the other things we do that allow space 
for crime.

PACII at its CWC did support the resolution to have a mixed group work 
on the yard waste plan. We also asked that the group meet with the 
public regularly to present findings and to accept comments. This will 
allow for a plan at the end that will best match what the community 
would like to see. I am very thankful to INC for creating momentum for this.

Would INC also consider that with the Solid Waste possition open, that a 
resolution like the one for yard waste be made for all waste? I do not 
feel like the last Director took community concerns when he was 
developing his plans for the department. This could be a great time to 
work on how our solid waste will he handled for years to come. I see a 
huge gap in recycle efforts by the City. We cannot expect to ship our 
waste away for ever. Just the fossil fuels used to do this must make 
most of us feel pain.

Richard




TheOcean1 at aol.com wrote:

> *Richard,*
> ** 
> * Surprised that the *New Hope Creek *issue is one PAC would address. 
> While any issue that is important to PAC, is also important to INC, 
> and we would hope visa versa, this one seems a far reach.*
> ** 
> * Another issue, closer and important to both our organizations, has 
> moved to the next step. We hope PAC will affirm our position below on 
> Yard Waste.*
>  
> *Bill Anderson*
> *INC President*
> *688-4550* 
>