INC NEWS - [owdna] background on the solid waste situation...
American LAbor
americanlabor at nc.rr.com
Mon May 22 10:50:28 EDT 2006
All,
The abuse of the task system is at the core of this problem. While it's foundations are rooted in 'rewarding' those who work it for completing their work quickly and efficiently, right now it's not providing the citizens of Durham either.
>From recent accounts it's been learned that over the period of several years Durham's Solid Waste Department has continued to employ this tactic eventhough the task of collections were NOT finished on a regular weekly basis.
This then required that Durham recall the same workers who did not complete the tasks in the first place (but were paid for it) and given overtime to finish the job. As is also confirmed by the expenses of the department, they also had to hire additional 'contractors' a significant number of times each month. This has become a very expensive way to pay for trash collections.
For some, the perception is that the task system has grown into a 'perk' that some have come to take advantage of. Thus siphoning off valuable city budget funds.
The simple question remains "Why continue a system that pays for something we don't get?"
Many of us are now seeing it's impact. "Action Jackson" just paid the price for trying to do something about it.
Among others, I also applaud the city Manager Patrick Baker for recognizing this.
A number of people (citizens, city council members and civic leaders) have asked for a more thorough investigation to determine what's best for us as taxpayers and elected officials, not just for individuals who work in (or contract for) the Solid Waste Department.
Certainly there are many more hazardous and task arduous job descriptions within the city employment that could argue that they are as deserving a 'benefit' as the task system in their departments.
Placing one above another or allowing one department to reap the rewards of a pay system that has gotten out of hand is not good city policy.
This is the time for it to be looked at with the everyone's goals in mind, not just one.
There are hard working employees all across Durham (Solid Waste included). Let's make sure that each of them get a compensation package that the citizens can afford which also can recognize the contribution they make, for the work they DO.
mike shiflett
----- Original Message -----
From: John Schelp
To: bwatu at yahoo.com
Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2006 1:18 PM
Subject: [owdna] background on the solid waste situation...
With apologies to those of you already on the
InterNeighborhood Council listserv, here is some more
background on the solid waste situation (from City
Manager Patrick Baker)...
I can confirm that Mr. Jackson voluntarily tendered
his resignation and I accepted it. I certainly wish
him well in all of his future endeavors.
Since 1999, solid waste collectors have been
compensated through the task system. Rather than
being compensated for hours worked, they are
compensated for tasks completed. The task system is
antithetical to the far more common time clock
employment system but is a surprisingly typical method
of compensation for solid waste collection positions.
Proponents see it as an incentive plan for arguably
the least desirable, hardest to fill positions in city
government. It also provides these collectors with an
opportunity (through a shorter work day) to supplement
their income through secondary employment which many
do. Despite the nature of the work, residential roll
out solid waste collection is by far the highest rated
service (in terms of customer satisfaction) provided
by the City.
The most obvious criticism of the task system is also
the least compelling: they get paid for 40 hours of
work but only work 33 (or so) hours. (Only a
government official could see the wisdom in such a
scheme.) The basic flaw in that argument is that
since 1999, they have not been compensated for the
hours they work; they have been compensated for the
tasks they complete. How long they work is not
primarily relevant in the task system as the number of
tasks completed is not primarily relevant in the time
clock system.
It has taken me a year to come to terms with the
benefits of the task system for solid waste collector
positions. My problem with our task system as it
presently exists is that it is heavily supplemented
by expensive temporary laborers. I would like to
significantly reduce if not eliminate our dependence
on temporary labor but that means filling current
vacancies and possibly over hiring to insure that we
have the in house staff available to complete our
routes (tasks) by the end of each day. The routes
should also be periodically analyzed to insure that
the value we place on their completion is appropriate.
Through a combination of vacancies, light duty medical
restrictions, and sick leave absences, we were
woefully unprepared to complete the routes Thursday
and Friday without the assistance of supplemental
labor. The citizen anger was predictable and frankly
quite understandable. As the City Manager although I
take full responsibility for the actions and decisions
of all of my directors, I found that nearly 10K missed
pickups last week to be completely unacceptable. In
the absence of a hurricane or an ice storm, we have
never to my knowledge had the number of delayed
pickups as we did last week and early this week.
Accordingly, last Friday evening, I directed the
return of the supplemental labor this week to allow us
to get caught up from last week. By noon yesterday,
we were caught up and everything is back to normal for
the remainder of the week.
Through an expedited hiring process, we will fill all
of our current vacancies by next Monday. We are also
exploring the creation of a supplemental pool of
floating city employees that will fill in as needed in
various solid waste divisions. This will wean us off
of the more expensive temporary labor services without
any breaks in service to the citizens. The savings
would most likely remain in the solid waste department
to be used to fill other needs and will be much
appreciated by the employees.
Stay tuned,
Patrick
*** A neighborly note: if you intend to reply to an individual who has posted (but don't intend it to go to the listserv), make sure that you have the recipient's email address in your "TO:" line and not "owdna at yahoogroups.com". Thanks! ***
SPONSORED LINKS Root cause analysis Hair loss cause Old west
Old west badge Volunteerism Old west clothing
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
a.. Visit your group "owdna" on the web.
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
owdna-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/private/inc-list/attachments/20060522/01158157/attachment.htm
More information about the INC-list
mailing list