INC NEWS - Column: City cuts would hurt arts scene in Durham (Herald-Sun)

Wed Jun 4 18:09:05 EDT 2008

Barry,

Clear, specific and concise NCA Grant applicant information was provided by 
the City Staff to the NCA applicants well before the 2008 funding and 
budgeting cycle.  The City Staff did an excellent job preparing and allowing 
sufficient time for each NCA grant applicant to seek clarification and / or 
assistance in preparing their applications as well as addressing any 
concerns and answering their questions.  The grant review and funding 
process did change this year and it was not done without adequate disclosure 
to those seeking grant funding.

There are many other NCA non-profit organizations and agencies in Durham as 
important and equally deserving for our limited tax dollar funding pool. 
Private and business funding sources are available within our community. 
When applicable, some of the agency programs could be included with existing 
city programs.

I understand and agree that City Hall cannot and should not be expected do 
it all.

Ronnie Griffin

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <bragin at nc.rr.com>
To: "Mike - Hotmail" <mwshiflett at hotmail.com>
Cc: <inc-list at durhaminc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:29 PM
Subject: Re: INC NEWS - Column: City cuts would hurt arts scene in Durham 
(Herald-Sun)

> "The Non-City Agency funding changes being implemented by the City Council
> are attempting to address this."
>
> that's one of the key points right there, Mike. Read the news articles and 
> you'd get the impression that staff came up with this idea all by 
> themselves. But this is, as far as i am aware, a policy decision made by 
> Council some time ago.
>
> Why wasn't this communicated to the non-profits before the funding cycle 
> began? For that matter, why wasn't the 54 cent property tax limit 
> communicated to staff *before* the budget cycle began? If Council had a 
> tax increase limit in mind, wouldn't it have made sense to let the manager 
> and budget director know *before* they put the budget together? Or does 
> someone actually think that by rejecting the proposed budget, our elected 
> leaders look as though they are standing up for the taxpayers?
>
> Really, the whole budget process this year has been disgraceful.
>
> Barry Ragin
> ---- Mike - Hotmail <mwshiflett at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> =============
> Mr. Pickle's post is a good one to read.
>
> Durham City government is having difficultly addressing an ever increasing
> list of maintenance priorities while also trying to address the number of
> new initiatives that require additional funding.
>
> Everything (and every organization) from non-profits to DDI and Hayti
> Heritage Center are being asked to find more $$$ themselves rather than
> continuing to ask the city for annual funding.
>
> The recent budget hearing at City Hall on Monday focused a lot of 
> attention
> on many deserving non-profits that have been dependant on the city (and
> county) for on-going support.
>
> With ever increasing demands on providing basic services (police & fire
> protection, minimum housing code enforcement, roads, sewer and water, 
> trash
> pickup/yard waste, other services) residents need to understand that there
> is not an unlimited amount of money to go around.
>
> Just reread Randy's post again.  City Hall can not do it all!
>
> The Non-City Agency funding changes being implemented by the City Council
> are attempting to address this.
>
> Agencies that have received annual allotments year after year will have to
> understand that this trend is not sustainable until core essential 
> services
> and functions of city government can be accomplished.   The process change
> in handling grants and processing of applications had to change.
>
> I'm a supporter of the arts,  but I don't expect the city to delay paving 
> a
> street/installing sidewalks or preventing a sewer leak to support an event
> I'd like to attend if it means by-passing these projects another two or
> three years!
>
> Except for Andy (Fraternal Order of Police seeking pay increases) I didn't
> hear anyone else speak on prioritizing those needs.
>
> The City and County will continue to fund Arts, youth programs, community
> development and crime (read gang) fighting non-profits in the future,  but
> not at the expense of providing the basic services we expect from them in 
> a
> timely manner.
>
> The way this funding application and evaluation process has changed is
> appropriate for these austere times.
>
> But please be reassured that the city (as far as I am aware) is not
> abandoning NCA's.
>
> It's only trying to do the most with what it's got while providing seed
> money and smaller incremental funding for the dozens of well deserving non
> profits that need (not want) this support and have proven their worth to 
> the
> community.
>
> It is also very logical for our elected officials and the manager to ask
> those departments that are currently in existence to assist in this 
> process
> by providing transparent evaluations and accountability standards for the
> areas of expertise they have rather than continuing the practice of
> directing a Budget and Finance department to handle them.
>
> It made no sense to have non-profits submit grant proposals to the Budget
> and Finance Departments when some of them had basic missions that were 
> more
> suited for review and evaluation under existing City Departments (Police,
> Neighborhood Improvement Services/Housing and Community Development, Parks
> and Recreation).
>
> It also didn't make any sense to have NCA's funded under a City budget 
> that
> had mission statements that were clearly under the jurisdiction of Durham
> County (education, social services, judicial and court recidivism) roles.
>
> Mr. Pickle's post is full of facts and figures about how far behind we are
> in capital improvement projects and maintenance needs, even with the 
> passage
> of the 2006 bond referendum.
>
> Until residents can say that they'd rather give non-profit's tens of
> thousands of taxpayer dollars each year instead of having a police officer
> on patrol or their graffiti removed quickly,  then we all will need to 
> tuck
> in our belts and support the arts the way most people have over the years
> and that's by buying a ticket or sending in a donation to these valuable
> non-profits ourselves.
>
> Dependence on governmental funding (at any level) is going to get more and
> more scarce.
>
> Which would you want your tax dollars to go for as a priority?
>
> The City of Durham is trying to address both 'needs' while trying to not
> ignore either of them.
>
> Mike Shiflett
>
> ps-I am in total support of having a focus group of concerned citizens,
> artists, arts related non-profits and the Arts Council to meet with City
> staff, administration and elected officials to better define a process 
> that
> addresses all three concerns (citizens, governmental responsibility, good
> will of supporting the Arts) regarding ongoing support of the Arts Master
> Plan.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "RW Pickle" <randy at 27beverly.com>
> To: <inc-list at durhaminc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 2:34 PM
> Subject: Re: INC NEWS - Column: City cuts would hurt arts scene in Durham
> (Herald-Sun)
>
>
>> There's a whole lot more to this funding cut than meets the eye. I
>> represent INC on the CCIP that looks at the projects our City
>> needs/wants/or must do by law. This year there were  more than $147M 
>> worth
>> of projects and only $30M to get anything done with. So it becomes a
>> matter of priority (or mandated law) that some get done before others (or
>> get funded as it is some cases).
>>
>> We worked for an entire year developing a scoring system for projects.
>> This way, as a group (because in total there are 26 citizens supposedly
>> representing a bunch of different groups from our City; realistically
>> there are probably less than 10 of us who regularly attend meetings), we
>> could easily and quickly compare apples to apples. The City Budget and
>> Finance Office also has their own scoring system they used for years. But
>> as one might think, what citizens might find important, the 
>> administration
>> might not.
>>
>> So this year, with our first scoring opportunity (and very little to work
>> with$ wise), there was only enough funding to deal with the first 20
>> projects that scored the most. And when the Administration did their
>> scoring, 17 of the top 20 projects the citizens came up with were the
>> same. So one could draw the conclusion that we're all pretty much on the
>> same wavelength when it comes to what has/needs/wants to be done. But 
>> that
>> doesn't answer the problem of what to do about the other $100M+ of things
>> we didn't even get to consider because there just wasn't enough money in
>> the first place to fund them.
>>
>> Between the City/County, we're looking (at least right now) at a $.15
>> increase (per $100 evaluation; and our recent evaluation just makes the
>> number we pay higher). Realistically, we probably need a $.45-$.60 per
>> $100 just to begin to get caught up. There's just not enough money to do
>> everything that is needed/wanted to be done. That's the bottom line.
>>
>> This coming year we are going to try to establish the 
>> first-ever-time-line
>> into the future so we can plan on funding (versus debt load) projects 
>> that
>> just never make it to the top of the list. It doesn't mean we don't
>> need/want them, it just means there are other things that have to be done
>> that require the funding we currently generate. How successful we will be
>> at delivering this down-the-road projection is yet to be known. But at
>> least with a plan, we should be able to begin to see some light at the 
>> end
>> of the tunnel...
>>
>> I don't see anything getting better in the short term. We are just so far
>> behind, catching up is going to be a struggle. Both in manpower and
>> funding. We are short on both...
>>
>> RWP
>> 27 Beverly
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> INC-list mailing list
>> INC-list at rtpnet.org
>> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/inc-list
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> INC-list mailing list
> INC-list at rtpnet.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/inc-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> INC-list mailing list
> INC-list at rtpnet.org
> http://lists.deltaforce.net/mailman/listinfo/inc-list
> 