[Durham INC] [C+H Neighborhood] Copper Theft

RW Pickle randy at 27beverly.com
Fri Mar 13 03:10:06 EDT 2009


Colin is right, I was talking steel. It remains the highest recycled metal
by volume in the world.  A TL (truck load) of copper starts at 40,000
pounds. If you add up ALL of the copper coils and pipes stolen locally it
wouldn't even come close to that weight. But if you throw a big number out
there as bait, maybe everyone will just read it and believe it's a bigger
problem than it really is. That is just not the case...

On copper prices and volumes being recycled, metalprices.com summed up the
now low market price for copper this way:

"Metalprices.com Copper Scrap Commentary updated: 27 FEB 2009

The USA scrap copper business has deteriorated even further since January

Processors are reporting the volume of incoming material has been reduced
by as much as 70%. Industrial production of copper bearing products in the
USA continues to shrink. Every week new announcements about production
cutbacks and factory layoffs appear in the press. At the same time there
is very little obsolete copper scrap being purchased "over the scale"
because most of it was recycled in 2007 and 2008 when copper prices were
at historical highs."

About the only market left for scrap copper is overseas. And processors
are reluctant to ship it that far due to any number of issues. So the
price for scrap copper will continue to decline and so will the theft of
it. And as I stated earlier, at least in District 3, there were no thefts
reported last month. You have Hope Valley, Forest Hills, Duke Forest,
Morehead Hills, and any number of other large homes over here in District
3 with many of them  having 2-3 even 4 units for cooling (because of the
larger homes). So why wouldn't theft be even better in District 3
neighborhoods with so many more units to steal from? It's all about the
neighborhoods and neighbors who look out for their hood. It's about
stabilized neighborhoods; not neighborhoods are being gentrified.

I'll take the time to find out from other Districts in the coming days
just so that you can see that this is not a wide-spread-current problem.
As I said, the Commander in District 3 didn't recall it even being
mentioned at the last joint meeting of all the District (5 of them) heads.
It may be isolated to Cleavland-Holloway, in which case setting up a
Neighborhood Watch and reporting theft to the DPD would help. And what
this amounts to is a crime issue that is victim-less (with insurance
covering the loss). As far as premiums going up across the town or nation
because of some copper theft in Cleavland-Holloway, that's not real. Think
about Katrina and the devastation with that storm. That's what causes
premiums to go up. Not isolated theft of copper in Durham, NC.

With the prices of copper falling, with the ring captured that was
responsible for most of the copper theft last year, and with at least one
District reporting no theft, it's hard to see that there is much of an
issue. Sure it may still happen, but cars are stolen all across this
community and crushed every day. Why not tackle junk yards? People lose
their transportation, getting to work becomes an issue. Life in general
changes for them. Someone steals a copper coil from an abandoned property
HVAC unit, the owner get a whole new unit (even if it wasn't working in
the first place). That's what I said earlier, some of it may even be
planned theft. I'd call it insurance fraud...

People have to be prudent in their actions. Allowing this theft to
continue, if by accident or by plan, is what is keeping this subject
alive. Protecting units when they are installed with the steel cages you
see in these neighborhoods is a far better way to prevent theft. That's
being prudent. You make it easy for people to steal whatever, they will.
Now whose fault should that be?

Has INC decided it is now going to tackle crime because of the success of
the PAC's?  Five times the number of people are regularly at their
respective PAC meetings; many more than INC has had in the last few years.
Why? Because people care about their neighborhoods. Why is INC now
tackling crime issues? It looks like it has become popular judging by the
attendance at the PAC meetings. I think this direction is far removed from
where INC should be heading. There are a lot of other issues INC could be
working on that do not deal with crime and would benefit the entire
community.

Is it the goal to jail the "Cleavland-Holloway Mob"? Or can't INC find any
other pressing issues to tackle that would benefit the entire community?
This is a neighborhood issue, not something INC regularly gets involved in
any more than to steer the neighborhood in the right direction. Crime in a
neighborhood, the last time I looked, is a matter for the Police. And
there are already laws on the books which make theft illegal (if
individuals do not care enough to protect their own valuables). Without
the help of the neighbors in a hood, crime will continue. INC can do
nothing about that. Just because a neighborhood pays the $25 to be a
member shouldn't mean that it can drag INC down paths it has no business
going. We once said that INC built better neighborhoods. You have to have
the neighbors in the hood who want it better first. Just because Ken
bought a cheap house in a bad neighborhood and wants to make it a better
neighborhood, doesn't mean INC is the vehicle for doing that. And it seems
unfair to every member hood of INC to place it at that level. If this were
an altruistic thought process, it would be different. But the newest 
neighbors of Cleavland-Holloway are motivated by cheap priced houses that
one day (and it's already happening) can be flipped for a profit. It's
like putting a square peg in a round hole; it's just not an easy task to
accomplish. There are many other issues that can be tackled and dealt with
that will benefit neighborhoods across the whole City/County. This is not
one of them...

Sorry for the length of this, but I am just getting tired of seeing INC
head in directions which are only self-serving to those taking it that
way. This is just another example...

RWP
27 Beverly

>
>
> This might be getting out of hand. Randy said at one point it's an
> individual issue, and even there the impact wasn't great because of
> insurance...  and
> that INC shouldn't be involved in individual issues.
>
> Some very good, although unrelated, points are being buried here under a
> lot
> of garbage.
>
> I've been a proponent for years of P2P (I've always known it as P2C, the
> same real time access to public information, and available to Citizens as
> well
> as Police instantly), a cheap (relatively speaking) software upgrade, if I
> understand it correctly.
>
> Also the Bottle Bill, I grew up in a 5c deposit state, and can attest to
> the
> litter it eliminates.
>
> But the subject is copper theft and when someone's home is ravaged, it can
> have serious effects on the neighborhood. It's not just A/C units, it's
> the
> copper plumbing, and the flooding that often results, all combined it can
> quickly turn a house from being renovated and a contributing part of the
> neighborhood, into a boarded up home that is a detracting influence on the
> neighborhood. This is especially true in the rapidly improving
> neighborhoods  near
> downtown such as the Cleveland Holloway Neighborhood, which is a dues
> paying member
> of INC, and has every right to bring a proposed resolution.
>
> I think anything that turns the American dream into a nightmare is
> neighborhood business. Would like to watch Randy explain to the couple
> who's  home is
> severely damaged, that it's covered by insurance. And who do you think
> covers
> that loss via premiums in the long run?
>
> Contrary to Randy's contention that copper theft is no longer a problem,
> the
> fact that a member neighborhood has brought forth a resolution to address
> it, is proof enough it's worth addressing.
>
> So let's get back to the resolution at hand.... here it is again as a
> reminder.
>
> Bill Anderson
>
>> Whereas, the current laws respecting the theft of copper,  including
>> the latest revisions passed by the North Carolina General  Assembly in
>> _____, have not been successful in stemming the tide of  copper theft;
>> and
>>
>> Whereas, though the economic downturn  has decreased the price of
>> copper, the magnitude of the problem is only  increasing, and the
>> injury done to the community is substantial;  and
>>
>> Whereas, the State of North Carolina and the several  counties and
>> municipalities are facing an extreme budget shortfall, and  that such a
>> shortfall is not helped by the fact that metal recyclers do  not report
>> metal sales to the taxing authority, and this results in a  tremendous
>> amount of untaxed economic activity;
>>
>> IT IS  HEREBY RESOLVED that the Durham InterNeighborhood Council
>> express the  sense of the neighborhoods to the Durham Elected Officials
>> and the  Durham State Delegation that copper theft remains a problem
>> and that the  state should look into alternatives which cause all metal
>> transactions  to be reported to the Revenue Office, linked with a valid
>> tax id number  of the metal seller, for all transactions above $10.00.
>
> ===================================================================
> In a message dated 3/12/2009 11:25:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> crc128 at gmail.com writes:
>
> Randy:
>
> Regarding your claim that my figures are in error, you  misrepresent
> the issue.  This discussion is about copper, not  steel.
>
> The point I made about the value of a container was for a  container of
> copper, not the steel and paper you reference.  Indeed,  scrap steel is
> very low in price, but, had you bothered to look at the  current spot
> prices, you'd find that scrap copper is worth about $1 per  pound.
> Yes, steel is only worth a few dollars a ton. That's why no one  takes
> the steel frame of the A/C unit - only the copper  coils.
>
> Regarding the impact of tax issues on neighborhoods, I remind  you that
> tax evasion played a major part bringing down the mob, which  helped
> save whole cities from the grip of crime.  This is merely a  tool,
> which, if employed properly, has been used successfully to stem  the
> tide of crime in the past. This has been brought up since the theft  of
> copper has been a huge problem in East Durham, and this is a way  to
> reduce that problem, without impact on law-abiding citizens.  It  helps
> the state to collect money that it is already owed, and it pays  for
> itself, keeping more money in our budgets for other  neighborhood
> issues.
>
> That is why it is a neighborhood  issue.
>
> -crc
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 9:26 PM, RW Pickle  <randy at 27beverly.com> wrote:
>> Let me use Maine as an example  since I am more familuar with some
>> system
>> that actually  works.
>>
>> On the side of each drink container you will find  States listed where a
>> fee is paid at point-of-sale. The legislation  that created the
>> returnable
>> container fee was called the Bottle Bill.  In Maine, that fee ($.05) is
>> tacked on to ever container sold. You  even see the States who support
>> this
>> recycling effort listed on  containers here (where we have yet to pass a
>> bottle bill). The stores  collect the $.05 and pass it along to the
>> State.
>> In turn, the State  repays recycling centers (independently owned
>> bussinesses) to collect  the empty used containers. These collection
>> centers pay  individuals/groups the $.05 that was paid at
>> point-of-purchase
>> when  they are returned. In return for their service, the State pays the
>>  collection centers $.02 + some percentage (this was the last time I
>> recall
>> what it amounted to being)  for recycling the containers.  It's
>> recycling
>> and there is no tax. Tax on the goods are paid when  initially sold, but
>> no
>> tax is collected on the recycling (except for  income earned through
>> working at a recycling center). Once these  recycled metals/plastics are
>> melted down and fabricated into something  else, the cycle starts over.
>> Hence re-cycle. The problem all of this  solved was litter. Now the
>> roadsides have no containers on them  because they are all worth $.05 to
>> anyone who returns them. And any  tax collected would be marginal
>> compared
>> to the benefit of lack of  container litter.
>>
>> In our business, we recycled paper. Not your  typical newspaper or
>> cardboard; large rolls of manufactured paper that  was the raw materials
>> for napkins, toilet paper or paper towels. We  had contracts to buy all
>> the
>> waste paper made by the mills. These lage  rolls weighed from 500-800
>> pounds each. We bought them initially for  $.0025 a pound. Once
>> recycled,
>> we sold them for $.99 a pound. We  didn't pay tax on the initial
>> purchase,
>> but colllected tax on the sell  of remanufactured goods. We also payed
>> income tax on those who worked  for us.
>>
>> Tax, collection and avoidance is not some place INC  needs to be. It
>> really
>> does not affect neighborhoods in the least. You  want to deal in
>> taxation
>> issues, do it with government at that level.  I totally disagree that
>> recycling should be taxed; income or  otherwise. It will do nothing to
>> improve any neighborhood in Durham  (unless it is encouraged). There is
>> currently no incentive for people  to recycle although we have worthless
>> City ordinances that maintain it  is against the law. Adding more
>> disincentives will do nothing to help  recycling efforts.
>>
>> Your figure on the value of a container of  scrap is incorrect. Here's
>> some
>> info that will help you  out:
>>
>> United States Scrap Prices Continue to  Fall
>>
>> Posted on March 10th, 2009 by admin
>> U.S. scrap  prices continue to fall since early February.
>>
>> During the first  week of March, the U.S. scrap prices dropped further
>> by
>> US$25~29/ton.  Also seeing a price decline was U.S. busheling scrap
>> price
>> which  reached US$197~207/ton as well as shredded steel scrap prices
>> which
>>  hit US$187~197/ton. Meanwhile H1 scrap was priced at  US$162~172/ton.
>>
>> It is said that U.S. scrap demand will remain  weak due to the economic
>> crisis. U.S. domestic mills have refused to  purchase materials.
>>
>> As for the supply, the scrap consumption  from motor vehicles, household
>> appliances, etc. are gradually  reducing.
>> In addition, the U.S. scrap export prices also continued to  go down.
>>
>> Source: www.yieh.com
>>
>> If you just do  the math relative to the information above, you'll see
>> how
>> your  statement would be impossible. Trucks would not be able to move it
>> nor  containers hold that much volume or weight.
>>
>> We filled up the  largest container we could last year and had it hauled
>> to
>> Raleigh  Scrap Metal. The stuff was easily stacked so we were able to
>> really  fill it up. After the container rental and transport fee, we had
>> a
>> net  of less than $10. Granted, disposal at the transfer station would
>> have
>>  cost a great deal and recycling saved a bundle, but there's not a lot
>> of
>> margin in the scrap business for anyone to get  rich...
>>
>> Let's scrap this idea and get on with something that  will make a
>> difference regionally. Ask the Legislative Delegation to  unify criminal
>> information so it's accessable by all law enforcement  regionally. This
>> will help make all of our communities safer. Beating  on recyling is
>> just
>> not green...
>>
>> RWP
>> 27  Beverly
>>
>>> Your double-taxation point is a red herring. If  taxation worked that
>>> way, then retailers like WalMart wouldn't  have to pay income tax, as
>>> their income comes from the sale of  goods which are taxed by sales tax
>>> (at the point of final sale),  and their workers all pay income tax.
>>> Indeed, anyone who produces  anything wouldn't have to pay tax, since
>>> only raw materials can be  obtained without sales tax (or an
>>>  exemption).
>>>
>>> Your point is incorrect since the income  tax is a tax on income and
>>> labor, not on the goods  themselves.
>>>
>>> And we're not talking about chump change,  we're talking about hundreds
>>> of thousands of dollars.  A  single container (40') can hold about 32
>>> tons.  At today's  scrap rates, each container will cost a recycler
>>> about $75,000 to  fill. That's a lot of nickles and dimes of tax
>>> evasion that the  state is leaving on the table.
>>>
>>>  -crc
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:28 PM, RW Pickle  <randy at 27beverly.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Tax on recycled items is  double taxation because the tax was
>>>> paid/collected when sold  (sales tax). It's true for HVAC copper just
>>>> as
>>>>  it
>>>> is with aluminum soda cans. It's true it would be income  (if taxed)
>>>> to
>>>> the
>>>> party selling it, but if  it's that big of a deal, the re-cycler has
>>>> that
>>>> info already  in their paperwork and could provide it to any authority
>>>>  that
>>>> wishes to chase the nickels and dimes. It's not a loop  hole, it's
>>>> double
>>>> taxation and may even thwart recycling  efforts.
>>>>
>>>> Income from the sell of stolen  copper should be small at best. There
>>>>  are
>>>> many bigger fish to fry...
>>>>
>>>>  RWP
>>>> 27 Beverly
>>>>
>>>>>  Randy,
>>>>>
>>>>> If you examine it closely, it  isn't a tax on recycling, it is a tax
>>>>> on
>>>>> income, income  which is currently evading tax illegally.  It is
>>>>>  currently the responsibility of the income receiver to declare  it,
>>>>> however it is only the law-abiding (like you) who  follow the rules
>>>>> and
>>>>> properly declare their income. This  simply causes the seller to
>>>>> formally recognize their  income - just like the rest of us.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Nothing special here, it looks like it's just closing a loophole
>>>>> which
>>>>> allows illegal activity to flourish, and raising  funds for the state
>>>>> in the  process.
>>>>>
>>>>>  -crc
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 2:27 PM,  RW Pickle <randy at 27beverly.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> So now,  even though many recycling efforts have failed, we want  to
>>>>>> further
>>>>>> "tax" the recycling  industry? I understand the desire of this, but
>>>>>>  recycling should be rewarded and not penalized. And adding to  the
>>>>>> burden
>>>>>> is not the way to  do this. You already have to have a valid photo
>>>>>> ID
>>>>>>  to
>>>>>> recycle metals (at valid recycling operations) and  personal
>>>>>> information
>>>>>>  is
>>>>>> gathered in that process. What's the purpose of the  legislation
>>>>>> when
>>>>>> thieves can just haul their booty to  VA (like the manhole cover
>>>>>> thefts
>>>>>> that occurred last  year)? These are thefts of personal property
>>>>>> (from
>>>>>>  private property typically) and do not effect the common nature  of
>>>>>> city-wide neighborhoods. Home owners insurance  generally covers the
>>>>>> theft
>>>>>> so  there is no public loss. It's not a neighborhood issue when
>>>>>> only
>>>>>> individuals are the ones involved... And although  I'll suggest this
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> no  supporting evidence, it may be that the individual property
>>>>>> owners
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> involved in the  thefts themselves. It would be a lot cheaper to pay
>>>>>>  the
>>>>>> insurance premiums than replace a HVAC system in a  property for
>>>>>> sell.
>>>>>> Not
>>>>>> may  homes have ever had the copper removed while  occupied...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In conversations  just now with the Captain of District 3, he said
>>>>>>  copper
>>>>>> theft has almost disappeared. He didn't recall  one in the last 30
>>>>>> days.
>>>>>> And  he didn't recall it being an issue across the City when the
>>>>>> whole
>>>>>> Police force leadership met last. There are more  car thefts across
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> City  than copper thefts. And this is every day... So are junk
>>>>>> yards
>>>>>>  next?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is another "feel  good" issue that is best left out of our
>>>>>>  Legislative
>>>>>> Delegation's hands. I'll mention this  again, a far better issue for
>>>>>>  them
>>>>>> to take forward is a communication/database  system where all local
>>>>>> law
>>>>>> enforcement can find out  information. As an example, Durham County
>>>>>> Sheriff's  Department does not have access to the P2P system that
>>>>>>  Durham
>>>>>> City Police uses. And as you spread out across  our region, you have
>>>>>> Orange, Wake, Person, etc. that  do not have the same access of
>>>>>>  information
>>>>>> sharing. The week before Eve Carson was  shot, those involved were
>>>>>> over
>>>>>>  in
>>>>>> Orange County (they didn't live there) and were  stopped for another
>>>>>> issue.
>>>>>> Had  Orange County been able to see they were on probation in
>>>>>> Durham,
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> would have been  in jail and not involved in the Carson death. To
>>>>>> me,
>>>>>>  this
>>>>>> is one of the most pressing law enforcement  issues that would make
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> of
>>>>>>  our streets safer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Build a  metal box around your HVAC ststem to protect it from theft
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> an issue, don't ask  our Legislative Delegation to waste time on
>>>>>>  personal
>>>>>>  issues...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  RWP
>>>>>> 27  Beverly
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  I think this is an excellent resolution. In addition to being  a
>>>>>>> neighborhood
>>>>>>> issue,  it is also a crime issue. Therefor (in my opinion) it
>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>  be
>>>>>>>  endorsed by all five of Durham's Partners Against  Crime
>>>>>>> organizations,
>>>>>>>  Durham
>>>>>>> Businesses Against Crime, and  InterNeighborhood  Council.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since I'm not  subscribed to PAC 1, 3, 4, & 5, perhaps someone
>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>> forward
>>>>>>> this  suggestion to the  others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bill  Anderson
>>>>>>>  PAC2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In a message  dated 3/12/2009 12:02:43 A.M. Eastern Daylight  Time,
>>>>>>> Ken at KenGasch.com  writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Please take a gander at resolution below. Authored by  Colin
>>>>>>>  Crossman
>>>>>>>  and
>>>>>>>  me..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would like for  Cleveland-Holloway to sponsor.   (i.e. place  in
>>>>>>> hopper
>>>>>>>  for
>>>>>>>  INC)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Comments?  Questions?  Go,  no-Go?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ken  Gasch
>>>>>>>  ********************************************************************
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Whereas,  the current laws respecting the theft of copper,
>>>>>>> including
>>>>>>> the latest  revisions passed by the  North Carolina General
>>>>>>> Assembly
>>>>>>>  in
>>>>>>> _____, have not  been successful in  stemming the tide of copper
>>>>>>>  theft;
>>>>>>>  and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whereas,  though the economic downturn has decreased the price  of
>>>>>>> copper, the  magnitude of the problem is  only increasing, and the
>>>>>>> injury done to the  community is substantial;  and
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whereas, the State  of North Carolina and  the several counties
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> municipalities are facing an extreme budget  shortfall, and that
>>>>>>> such  a
>>>>>>> shortfall is not helped by the fact that metal  recyclers do not
>>>>>>>  report
>>>>>>> metal sales to the taxing authority, and  this  results in a
>>>>>>>  tremendous
>>>>>>> amount of untaxed economic  activity;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IT IS  HEREBY RESOLVED that the Durham InterNeighborhood  Council
>>>>>>> express the sense  of the  neighborhoods to the Durham Elected
>>>>>>>  Officials
>>>>>>> and the Durham State  Delegation  that copper theft remains a
>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>> and that the  state should  look into alternatives which cause  all
>>>>>>> metal
>>>>>>> transactions  to be reported to  the Revenue Office, linked with  a
>>>>>>> valid
>>>>>>> tax id number  of the metal seller,  for all transactions  above
>>>>>>>  $10.00.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
>>>>>>>  You  received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>> Google
>>>>>>> Groups
>>>>>>>  "Cleveland Holloway Neighborhood" group.
>>>>>>> To post  to this group, send email  to
>>>>>>>  ClevelandHollowayNeighborhood at googlegroups.com
>>>>>>> To  unsubscribe from this  group, send email to
>>>>>>>  ClevelandHollowayNeighborhood+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
>>>>>>>  For more  options, visit this group at
>>>>>>>  http://groups.google.com/group/ClevelandHollowayNeighborhood?hl=en
>>>>>>>  -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in
>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>>  easy
>>>>>>> steps!
>>>>>>>
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219671244x1201345076/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmp
> gID
>>>>>>>  %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
>>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>  Durham INC Mailing List
>>>>>>>  list at durham-inc.org
>>>>>>>  http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  ====================================================================
>>>>>>  This e-mail, and any attachments to it, contains PRIVILEGED  AND
>>>>>> CONFIDENTIAL information intended only for the use  of the
>>>>>> addressee(s)
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> entity  named on the e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail, or the  employee or agent responsible for delivering it to
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>  intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any  reading,
>>>>>> dissemination or copying of this e-mail in  error is strictly
>>>>>> prohibited.
>>>>>>  If you have received this electronic  transmission in error,
>>>>>> please
>>>>>> notify
>>>>>> me by telephone  (919-489-0576) or by electronic mail
>>>>>>  (pickle at patriot.net)
>>>>>>  immediately.
>>>>>>  =====================================================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Durham  INC Mailing List
>>>>>>  list at durham-inc.org
>
>>>>>>  http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> Crossman Properties, LLC
>>>>> 762 Ninth  St #591
>>>>> Durham, NC 27705
>>>>>  www.CrossmanProperties.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ====================================================================
>>>>  This e-mail, and any attachments to it, contains PRIVILEGED  AND
>>>> CONFIDENTIAL information intended only for the use of the
>>>> addressee(s)
>>>> or
>>>> entity named on the e-mail. If  you are not the intended recipient of
>>>> this
>>>>  e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to
>>>> the
>>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any  reading,
>>>> dissemination or copying of this e-mail in error is  strictly
>>>> prohibited..
>>>> If you have received this electronic  transmission in error, please
>>>> notify
>>>> me  by telephone (919-489-0576) or by electronic mail
>>>>  (pickle at patriot.net)
>>>> immediately.
>>>>  =====================================================================
>>>>
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>> Durham INC  Mailing List
>>>> list at durham-inc.org
>>>>  http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>  ====================================================================
>
>>  This e-mail, and any attachments to it, contains PRIVILEGED AND
>>  CONFIDENTIAL information intended only for the use of the addressee(s)
>> or
>> entity named on the e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient  of
>> this
>> e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it  to the
>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any  reading,
>> dissemination or copying of this e-mail in error is strictly
>> prohibited.
>> If you have received this electronic  transmission in  error, please
>> notify
>> me by telephone (919-489-0576) or by electronic  mail
>> (pickle at patriot.net)
>> immediately.
>>  =====================================================================
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2
> easy
> steps!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219671244x1201345076/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID
> %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)
> _______________________________________________
> Durham INC Mailing List
> list at durham-inc.org
> http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>


====================================================================
This e-mail, and any attachments to it, contains PRIVILEGED AND
CONFIDENTIAL information intended only for the use of the addressee(s) or
entity named on the e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading,
dissemination or copying of this e-mail in error is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this electronic  transmission in error, please notify
me by telephone (919-489-0576) or by electronic mail (pickle at patriot.net)
immediately.
=====================================================================



More information about the INC-list mailing list