[Durham INC] Homeowners Associations
Barry Ragin
bragin at nc.rr.com
Thu Jul 8 18:00:46 EDT 2010
Don't know how accurate it is, but WRAL is teasing a story coming up on
the 6 O'Clock News about a Wake County HOA that is engaging in this
practice. I assume the story will be available on-line later tonight,
and we can check whether they're sensationalizing or reporting accurately.
Barry Ragin
Mike Brooks wrote:
> Another good place to look for more information about what HOAs can
> and cannot do is the NC HOA Association, especially their FAQ page:
>
> http://www.hoa-nc.com/faqs.aspx (You can also read the applicable
> laws in Chapter 47F of the NC General Statutes.)
>
> I read the article on the Texas HOAs, and it's definitely still the
> wild west.As Parkwood is concerned we have yet to see a house with
> uncooperative owners and seriously delinquent dues (which is what it
> takes for us, at least, to proceed with foreclosure) that didn't have
> a larger senior lien from a bank. That makes resale after foreclosure
> a real can of worms.
>
> Even on the rare occasions when we go forward with foreclosure, the
> process takes a lot longer than the 27 days in Texas. In practice, we
> are far more likely to file a lien on a property, which would prevent
> its sale unless the lein is satisfied, and would show up on the
> owner's credit report. The 1% or so of properties who get to that
> point don't pose a major financial disaster, and we'll collect the
> money eventually.
>
> As far as foreclosure for non-payment of fines & collection costs only
> (not for unpaid dues), NC law only allows judicial foreclosure -- no
> Texas loophole. In fact it sounds like the Texas laws have more
> loopholes than laws. The NC statutes were updated a few years ago to
> close some similar loopholes, although pre-existing HOAs, like
> Parkwood, are grandfathered in to many of the newer provisions.
>
> The bottom line for us is that we have no interest in becoming
> property owners by foreclosing on our neighbors, even if that is
> sometimes the only possible way to collect past-due assessments.
>
> Mike Brooks
> Parkwood
>
> Barry Ragin wrote:
>
>> Mike - nobody made the claim that all, or even any, HOAs were bad.
>>
>> I was pointing out the distinction between HOAs, which are generally
>> covenanted, require membership among the homeowners who live in the
>> community, own property in common, and have certain legal rights and
>> obligations, and neighborhood associations, which are voluntary, do
>> not have, nor can they enforce any covenants, generally speaking do
>> not own community property (i can think of one exception in Durham),
>> and do not under any circumstances have legal claim to anyone's
>> property.
>>
>> Many people do not understand those distinctions, and are afraid to
>> join a neighborhood association out of fear that they are giving up
>> certain rights as homeowners.
>>
>> It should go without saying that there are good and bad examples of
>> either, but that's not the point. A "bad" neighborhood association
>> board of directors is not going to have the right to foreclose on
>> your house because your annual dues are unpaid, nor levy a fine
>> because your shutters are the wrong color. Hopefully, the neighbors
>> we both have who are reluctant to get involved in our neighborhood
>> associations because they have that fear will understand that there
>> is no basis for it.
>>
>> Barry Ragin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Durham INC Mailing List
> list at durham-inc.org
> http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>
More information about the INC-list
mailing list