[Durham INC] language and consequences of marriage amendment
Darius Mercedes Little
Darius.M.Little at alumni.unc.edu
Thu Sep 15 18:56:21 EDT 2011
Joshua:
I'd assume that since the various relationships you listed aren't considered "unions" that they could easily have items willed/shared/etc via "contracts."
The legislation clearly states that the language does not prohibit any court from being able to adjudicate on such matters; that would entail probate matters.
Hope that makes you feel a 'little' better.
- DML
--------------------
Darius M. Little
Executive Business Consultant and
Strategic Marketing Analyst
(web) www.linkedin.com/in/dariuslittle
Manta Business Profile/Report:
http://www.manta.com/c/mtlwj1m/little-s-business-consulting
"And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive." [Matt 21:22]
-----Original Message-----
From: Joshua Allen <allen.joshua at gmail.com>
Sender: inc-list-bounces at rtpnet.org
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:43:06
To: chloe palenchar<cpalenchar at hotmail.com>
Cc: <inc-list at rtpnet.org>
Subject: Re: [Durham INC] language and consequences of marriage amendment
_______________________________________________
Durham INC Mailing List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
More information about the INC-list
mailing list