[Durham INC] language and consequences of marriage amendment

[Barry Ragin]

Darius - perhaps you could explain to me why knowing that this amendment 
is specifically written to turn a group of North Carolinians into second 
class citizens should make any of us "feel better."

Thanks,
Barry Ragin

On 9/15/11 6:56 PM, Darius Mercedes Little wrote:
> Joshua:
>
> I'd assume that since the various relationships you listed aren't considered "unions" that they could easily have items willed/shared/etc via "contracts."
>
> The legislation clearly states that the language does not prohibit any court from being able to adjudicate on such matters; that would entail probate matters.
>
> Hope that makes you feel a 'little' better.
>
> - DML
>
>
>
>
> --------------------
> Darius M. Little
> Executive Business Consultant  and
> Strategic Marketing Analyst
>
> (web) www.linkedin.com/in/dariuslittle
>   
> Manta Business Profile/Report: 
> http://www.manta.com/c/mtlwj1m/little-s-business-consulting
>
>   
> "And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive." [Matt 21:22]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Allen<allen.joshua at gmail.com>
> Sender: inc-list-bounces at rtpnet.org
> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:43:06
> To: chloe palenchar<cpalenchar at hotmail.com>
> Cc:<inc-list at rtpnet.org>
> Subject: Re: [Durham INC] language and consequences of marriage amendment
>
> _______________________________________________
> Durham INC Mailing List
> list at durham-inc.org
> http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Durham INC Mailing List
> list at durham-inc.org
> http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>