[Durham INC] Help --Trinity Park Wetland could save Durham $20 M and more...
TheOcean1 at aol.com
TheOcean1 at aol.com
Wed May 9 22:57:18 EDT 2012
Yup, I'm with John, those neighborhoods (and any that might be forming in
that area) should have first and heavier weighted votes - for want of a
better term.
That also allows other neighborhoods to scratch their heads awhile and
examine such things as cost benefits. Personally, the total estimated cost
seemed shocking to me. They had this property under contract to buy for well
under $3 million a couple years ago, and you'll need to add demolition and
tipping the building into the landfill fees. (I hope some things can be
salvaged, like the gym floor)
So it will cost how many million to create a natural area?
Bill Anderson
In a message dated 5/9/2012 10:09:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
bulldurhamnc at yahoo.com writes:
Melissa,
Before you and others rush to embrace this, I think it would be wise to
get input from the neighborhoods most directly affected: Trinity Park, Old
North Durham, and Central Park.
I have a lot of questions about this and the effects it will have on those
neighborhoods. The cost savings and environmental concerns are not the
only issues.
John
--- On Wed, 5/9/12, Melissa Rooney <mmr121570 at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Melissa Rooney <mmr121570 at yahoo.com>
Subject: [Durham INC] Help --Trinity Park Wetland could save Durham $20 M
and more ---
To: "INC" <inc-list at rtpnet.org>, "Durham Enviro"
<durhamenviro at yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 9:15 PM
Please review the article below and consider writing Mayor Bell and the
City Council (council at durhamnc.gov) with your support for construction of a
wetland at the old Diet and Fitness Center on Trinity Avenue for the
following reasons:
1) this wetland will help to reduce the velocity of water runoff during
storm events, thereby reducing erosion of private properties that now suffer
from storm water run-off directed through those properties. We NEED more
wetlands and retention ponds in this watershed to protect existing structures
and private properties.
2) this wetland would be aesthetically pleasing and provide wildlife with
a much needed habitat in our urban area;
3) this wetland would immensely help naturally filter Nitrogen and
Phosphorous and other pollutants out of the Ellerbe Creek Watershed, which flows
into Falls Lake and could save Durham as much as $20 Million in the long run
with regard to costs of BMPs (best management practices) required to
reduce N and P runoff into Falls Lake (as a result of the Falls Lake Rules).
_The Durham News | Wetland could save city up to $20M_
(http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=wetland%20wise%20durham%20news&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CFcQ
FjAA&url=http://www.thedurhamnews.com/2012/05/08/212014/wetland-could-save-c
ity-up-to.html&ei=dxSrT8PAOcautwfJ5eiiAg&usg=AFQjCNFLs0wgbZEUajqkt4SN6kIdrtL
3fA)
(http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=wetland%20wise%20durham%20news&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CFcQFjAA&url=http://www.thedurhamnews.com/2012/05/08/212014
/wetland-could-save-city-up-to.html&ei=dxSrT8PAOcautwfJ5eiiAg&usg=AFQjCNFLs0
wgbZEUajqkt4SN6kIdrtL3fA)
http://www.thedurhamnews.com/2012/05/08/212014/wetland-could-save-city-up-to.html
Thanks for your consideration and input!
Melissa (Rooney)
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Durham INC Mailing List
_list at durham-inc.org_ (mip://09f42eb8/mc/compose?to=list@durham-inc.org)
_http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html_ (http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html)
_______________________________________________
Durham INC Mailing List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20120509/d484e772/attachment.html>
More information about the INC-list
mailing list