[Durham INC] Help --Trinity Park Wetland could save Durham $20 M and more...
Pat Carstensen
pats1717 at hotmail.com
Thu May 10 06:13:53 EDT 2012
I thought we discussed this at a delegate meeting and thought the question for us was less "yes or no" but "how do we do it in a way that is most compatible with neighborhood needs?"
Regards, pat
From: TheOcean1 at aol.com
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 22:57:18 -0400
To: bulldurhamnc at yahoo.com; mmr121570 at yahoo.com; inc-list at durhaminc.org
Subject: Re: [Durham INC] Help --Trinity Park Wetland could save Durham $20 M and more...
Yup, I'm
with John, those neighborhoods (and any that might be forming in that area)
should have first and heavier weighted votes - for want of a better
term.
That also
allows other neighborhoods to scratch their heads awhile and examine such things
as cost benefits. Personally, the total estimated cost seemed shocking to
me. They had this property under contract to buy for well under $3 million a
couple years ago, and you'll need to add demolition and tipping the building
into the landfill fees. (I hope some things can be salvaged, like the gym
floor)
So it will
cost how many million to create a natural area?
Bill
Anderson
In a message dated 5/9/2012 10:09:23 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
bulldurhamnc at yahoo.com writes:
Melissa,
Before you and others rush to embrace this, I think it would be
wise to get input from the neighborhoods most directly affected:
Trinity Park, Old North Durham, and Central Park.
I have a lot of questions about this and the effects it will have
on those neighborhoods. The cost savings and environmental concerns are
not the only issues.
John
--- On Wed, 5/9/12, Melissa Rooney
<mmr121570 at yahoo.com> wrote:
From:
Melissa Rooney <mmr121570 at yahoo.com>
Subject: [Durham INC]
Help --Trinity Park Wetland could save Durham $20 M and more
---
To: "INC" <inc-list at rtpnet.org>, "Durham Enviro"
<durhamenviro at yahoogroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2012,
9:15 PM
Please review the article below and consider writing Mayor Bell
and the City Council (council at durhamnc.gov) with
your support for construction of a wetland at the old Diet and Fitness
Center on Trinity Avenue for the following reasons:
1) this wetland will help to reduce the velocity of water runoff
during storm events, thereby reducing erosion of private properties
that now suffer from storm water run-off directed through those
properties. We NEED more wetlands and retention ponds in this
watershed to protect existing structures and private
properties.
2) this wetland would be aesthetically pleasing and provide
wildlife with a much needed habitat in our urban area;
3) this wetland would immensely help naturally filter Nitrogen
and Phosphorous and other pollutants out of the Ellerbe Creek
Watershed, which flows into Falls Lake and could save Durham as
much as $20 Million in the long run with regard to costs of BMPs (best
management practices) required to reduce N and P runoff into Falls
Lake (as a result of the Falls Lake Rules).
The Durham News | Wetland could save city
up to $20M
http://www.thedurhamnews.com/2012/05/08/212014/wetland-could-save-city-up-to.html
Thanks for your consideration and input!
Melissa (Rooney)
-----Inline Attachment
Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Durham
INC Mailing List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
_______________________________________________
Durham
INC Mailing
List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
_______________________________________________
Durham INC Mailing List
list at durham-inc.org
http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20120510/f1cc30e7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the INC-list
mailing list