[Durham INC] petition for veto of state bill to force water for 751 South development

[Melissa Rooney]

It's my understanding that S229 is full of loopholes and rollbacks that benefit polluters, which would affect development practices in Durham including the 751 S development, while H953 delays cleanup of pollution in the Jordan Lake watershed.


Melissa



________________________________
 From: Richard Ford <rbford at aim.com>
To: Melissa Rooney <mmr121570 at yahoo.com> 
Cc: INC <inc-list at rtpnet.org> 
Sent: Sunday, 15 July 2012 8:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Durham INC] petition for veto of state bill to force water for 751 South development
 

Melissa,

Am I misreading? It appears to be a petition on the two year delay in Jordan Lake cleanup, not water for 751 South. I believe that was defeated in the Senate.

I think the clean-up delay is a big deal but it's not 751. My recollection is that Greensboro requested it.

Best

Dick

On Jul 15, 2012, at 12:19 AM, Melissa Rooney wrote:

Please read the following petition about the state  bill to force Durham to provide water to 751 South and consider signing it.
>
>
>https://secure3.convio.net/engage/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=6159
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>Melissa (Rooney)
>
>_______________________________________________
>Durham INC Mailing List
>list at durham-inc.org
>http://www.durham-inc.org/list.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20120715/c9ff9116/attachment.html>