[Durham INC] Fw: Forced Pooling, Conflicts Revealed

[Melissa Rooney]

The conflicts of interest that are apparent at virtually every level of government still astound (if not surprise) me.
Thought I'd send this on as the latest reminder...Melissa (Rooney)

--- On Sun, 10/2/13, David Streifford <noreply at list.signon.org> wrote:

From: David Streifford <noreply at list.signon.org>
Subject: Forced Pooling, Conflicts Revealed
To: mmr121570 at yahoo.com
Received: Sunday, 10 February, 2013, 9:44 AM

Good Morning,

Reuters News Service printed this story on Feb. 8, 2013: http://blogs.reuters.com/events/2013/02/08/in-north-carolina-fracking-rights-rise-to-surface/

I highlighted one section in this article - bolded and italicized, which quotes Ray Covington drawing a comparison of forced pooling to that of a civil rights attorney defending a client and, if they win in court, the attorney shares in the profit. Are you kidding me? He sees himself as a civil rights attorney? Covington is a major land owner in Lee County. He also serves on the Mining & Energy Commission created and tasked by the General Assembly to develop a body of regulations to make oil and gas drilling in NC safe. Covington is the Chairperson of the Compulsory [aka Forced] Pooling Study Group. He says he has no conflict of interest. Really! He claims to be looking out for the interests of Lee County landowners. Even if this is true, and it most certainly could be, how does that remove his obvious and glaring financial conflict of interest? 

Every decision Covington makes with regard to forced pooling can only be in his self interest. As such, he should recuse himself from all such deliberations. Indeed, the Chair of the MEC, James Womack, should force such recusal. 

It should be clear that the MEC has little interest in developing tough guidelines. Indeed, Womack has said on more than one occasion that he would not want to write regulatons that would discourage companies from fracking in NC. So, what we see transpiring in NC is exactly what has happened in PA, TX, LA and the other states with the worst environmental records. 

No person would want to live in a fracking zone. No company would locate there [except for the fly-by-nighters]. Just ask Vince and Jeanne Rhea and the thousands just like them.
This is a disaster in the making!

Please stand up for your natural rights to clean air, clean water and safe communities. Write your legislators and the Governor, even if you think it may not help. Put the pressure on! Write a letter to the editor. Call your representatives, town council members, commission members. Tell your neighbors; email your friends. DO SOMETHING to put an end to this madness.

Our water supplies and water quality are far more important than the VERY temporary and alleged benefits from fracking in North Carolina.

Thanks for hanging with me on this.

Best,

Dave 



ps: I'm enclosing this link to Flow: For Love of Water: http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/flow-for-love-of-water/
It's about 20 minutes long but it is well worth it!!





In North Carolina, fracking rights rise to surface

By Hallie Seegal
 
FEBRUARY 8, 2013



 Email
 Print
inShare






 

ENVIRONMENT | FRACKING | HYDRAULIC FRACTURING | NATURAL GAS | NORTH CAROLINA | SHALE


A natural gas pipeline is seen under construction near East Smithfield in Bradford County, Pennsylvania, January 7, 2012. REUTERS/Les Stone

Three years ago, Vince and Jeanne Rhea found the house of their dreams in Shirley, Arkansas. They couldn’t believe the deal: 40 acres complete with a separate workshop that Jeanne could use as an art studio and two nearby lakes. It was also thousands of dollars cheaper than a property of that quality should have been. They booked a plane ticket from Raleigh, North Carolina that day to fly down and buy it.
When they got to Arkansas, they found out why it was so cheap.
The owner of the house had recently sold the mineral rights under the property to a natural gas company for use in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a drilling technique that is opening new areas across the country for energy exploration. The front page of the local newspaper that day had a story about problems in the water supply and was advising residents not to bathe, Jeanne recalled. “There was no way we were making an offer after that,” she said.
The Rheas ultimately decided to stay at home in North Carolina and retired in rural Lee County outside of Raleigh. What they didn’t realize is that the new home they bought sits above the Deep River Shale basin, an area potentially rich with deposits of natural gas that makes it the next likely location for fracking.
To make matters worse, because of two arcane laws known as split estates and forced pooling, they may not even have the right to say whether gas companies can drill on their property.
In recent years, energy companies have used these precedents to bypass property owners who object to drilling under their turf. Now residents in North Carolina, which legalized fracking just last year, hope their government will protect their property rights before drilling begins.
“Whether we want to sell or not, the gas companies could take our property from us,” said Vince Rhea.
North Carolina gives mineral rights owners the right to drill on land without a property owner’s consent. A bigger problem is that some of its citizens live on plots of land with severed mineral rights and don’t know it.
The separation of mineral rights and property rights may be a familiar concept to residents of Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Colorado and Texas — all areas plentiful in production of oil, gas and minerals. But the meaning of mineral rights for North Carolina landowners, where the coal industry has been dormant for decades, was unclear until very recently. Most people didn’t even know such a thing existed.
A split estate applies to someone who owns a parcel of property, but not the rights to the minerals beneath it. It was adapted from a 16th century English law that declared the monarchy as the rightful owner of all the country’s buried gold and silver deposits.
This morning, Lee County officials released a map of the area that, for the first time, will inform residents if they own the mineral rights underneath their yards.
The reason many landowners may not know whether they own their mineral rights is because Lee County was formed in 1907. But landowners were not required by law to disclose the separation of oil, gas and mineral rights to purchasers until October 2012.
Dan Butler is a Lee County mineral rights owner who resides in a neighboring area. Back in 1974, Butler purchased the mineral rights for approximately 2,700 of acres of land. It’s the land under which his father, a coal miner, worked. He’s now the single largest holder of mineral rights in the jurisdiction.
Butler leased his mineral rights to WhitMar Exploration Company. They are working to determine if oil and gas resources are locked in shale-rock formations underneath.
Dr. Ray Covington, a member of North Carolina’s Mining and Energy Commission, which is responsible for developing regulations for natural gas exploration in the state, said about 90 families in Lee County own property that have been separated from the mineral rights. Twenty-eight of them own land above Dan Butler’s acreage.
One individual, who wished not to be named as he was unaware of his situation until he was reached by Reuters, owns nearly half of the land above Butler’s minerals. The individual’s over 1000 acres would fit an above ground well pad, which typically range in size from 5-15 acres.
Five other individuals who own land above Butler’s minerals for non-residential purposes that were reached by Reuters were aware of the split estate when they purchased their land. A sixth couldn’t remember if he learned about it at the time of sale or afterwards. Three of them expressed concerns about the condition their property may be left in if drilling happens on their land.
Of the three landowners with a residence above Butler’s minerals that were reached by Reuters, only one had knowledge of their situation.
While land purchasers prior to October 2012 could have asked for a title search to determine if the mineral rights for a given property were still attached, the antebellum days of copper and coal mining have been over for years. Fracking wasn’t yet a part of the public consciousness.
Jim Womack, a Lee County commissioner as well as the chairman of the state’s Mining and Energy Commission, explained that very few people who bought land in Lee County over the past few decades knew about oil and gas locked in the ground underneath.
“Ten years ago, there just wasn’t much discussion about shale. Very few people knew there was oil and gas so very little consideration was given to whether anyone owned mineral rights. It wasn’t a major concern until word got out.”
Privately-held WhitMar, based in Denver, declined to comment on their leased mineral rights as is their policy on current projects. The American Petroleum Institute, a trade association representing the oil and natural gas industry, as well as Energy In Depth, a public outreach group representing the Independent Petroleum Association of America, also declined to comment on individuals who may be unaware of living on a split estate, citing lack of knowledge on the situation.
Womack says the county needs the economic boost that natural gas drilling will bring the community.
“Anything we can do to bring job opportunities is a good thing,” he said.
FORCED POOLING
Vince Rhea is skeptical of the commission, as some of its members have financial interest in natural gas drilling coming to Lee County.
Covington, a commission member, owns N.C. Oil and Gas, a group that represents landowner’s interests in exchange for a share of future profits.
“It’s like having the fox watch the chicken coop,” says Rhea.
Covington, who is also the chairman of the state’s compulsory pooling study group, says his first priority is to make sure land and mineral rights owners aren’t taken advantage of by predatory leases.
“It’s just like a civil rights attorney who represents a client and shares the profits if they win,” Covington says. [emphasis added]
Compulsory pooling, also known as forced pooling, allows oil and gas companies to use private property without permission if a certain number of adjacent mineral rights owners lease their acreage out for gas production.
Part of the new wave of the shale boom that has raised property owners’ fears involves the technique of horizontal drilling which blasts a mixture of water, sand and chemicals deep into the earth to break up shale rock. The subterranean infrastructure stretches out hundreds of feet laterally, thereby crossing dozens of property lines at a time. If just one property owner objects, the whole project could dismantle. Forced pooling prevents this situation from becoming an issue.
As of this writing, North Carolina common law requires oil and natural gas developers to give property owners 30 days notice via certified mail before beginning drilling operations on their land. The notice must include an offer to discuss with the property owner where on the surface the disturbance should take place. It’s one of a variety of regulations that while limited, offers North Carolina residents “considerably more protections for surface owners than many other states,” the North Carolina Attorney General’s office said in an email.
Meanwhile, Butler is eager to get started. “It’s ridiculous to take two years to build regulations while they’re doing a great job in other states,” Butler said, “but politicians take awhile to work with attorneys so it’s one of those things we have to be patient and wait for.”
Jeanne and Vince Rhea, who narrowly escaped from buying a home with a split estate, now worry they’ll become “sandwiched” between other gas leases and be forced to concede their property.
“If I didn’t know better, I’d say I was living in some place other than the United States,” Vince said.

Contact the reporter at hallie.seegal at thomsonreuters.com 
 




This message was sent to Melissa Rooney
by David Streifford from the SignOn.org
system. 

MoveOn.org Civic Action sponsors SignOn.org, 
but does not endorse specific campaigns or the contents of this message.



To unsubscribe or report this email as inappropriate, click here:
http://www.signon.org/unsub.html?i=8919-2364179-qlN=Hu



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://rtpnet.org/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20130210/724f5322/attachment.html>