[Durham INC] SCAD?

[R Z]

Thanks Tom. I'm going to plead my ignorance here but I am not sure that I
know what it means for something to fail in a planning commission vote. I
believe the PC is purely advisory correct? So does this mean that SCAD
could still move to a city council vote soon?

On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 4:11 PM tom miller <miller.tom2022 at gmail.com> wrote:

> The [planning commission voted against the developer’s proposal 50-50
> which means it failed.  The commission voted for the commission’s version
> of the proposal which I have not seen in writing yet and am not sure I
> fully understand.  I know it responds to a great many of the objections the
> staff expressed in its cover memo dated the date of the commission
> meeting.  This version may be available now.  I have not checked back with
> the holidays, house guests, etc.
>
>
>
> FWIW, my comments to the commission are attached.  To understand them, you
> need to read the developer’s version along side.
>
>
>
> Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* R Z <richard.ziglar at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, January 9, 2023 10:44 AM
> *To:* inc-list at lists.deltaforce.net
> *Subject:* SCAD?
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I heard the Planning Commission vote on SCAD was 50/50. Please forgive me
> if this has been discussed more in depth and I missed it, but what is the
> next thing happening in this regard? Where does the issue stand with the
> city council?
>
> I need to update my neighborhood association on Wed. so I'm just trying to
> be as current as possible.
>
> thanks!
>
> Richard
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/inc-list/attachments/20230109/679572cc/attachment.htm>